Matt Panzer

@jnr, Just to clarify: Was the file original created in an earlier version of Vectorworks or did it originate in VW 2025? If it was created in VW 2025, did you use one of your templates from an earlier version?

@jnr, Would it be possible to send me the original VW 2024 file privately? I did not see any bug reports on this and would like to submit one to have this looked at.

Yeah, I was very suspicious of that when looking at your screenshot and was about to suggest trying what you did. I'll look into this…

This can be changed in the Grid Line Settings:

Can you send me the file (with the Interior Elevation Marker in question selected) via private message?

@Shortnort, Have you checked the visibilities in the "Legend Image Classes" for the graphic legend?

Have you looked at the Marker Scaling in the Advanced Properties? Was the file brought forward from a previous Vectorworks version?

Thank you for pointing this out! Bug reported (VB-207692).

This is certainly not as intended and is a known bug (VB-203600). I commented on the bug report to try to get this pushed up in priority.

In VW 2024, you can right-click on the window object or window style, edit the “Plug-in Object Options”, and deselect the “Use wall closure” checkbox. As you mentioned, it is a bit of a moot point since the “Show shim Gaps” setting will go away when you open the file in VW 2025.

This is actually working as designed due to how wall closures work. With the introduction of wall closures, the only way to accurately show the wall closure profile and wrapping in all cases is to actually section the wall geometry at the closure for the Top/Plan representation. Since shim gaps are modeled into the wall geometry and the Top/Plan graphics are derived by sectioning, they always show when using wall closures. Because wall closures are now turned on by default in later versions of Vectorworks, the "Show shim gaps" option has been removed from the Door and Window in Vectorworks 2025 because the option does not work with wall closures.

You're welcome! Thank you for bringing it to our attention!

@cberg, This looks like a bug and I found a similar issue (VB-194626) previously reported. I commented on the bug report and attached a version of your file to make sure this case gets looked at. Unfortunately, I know of no tricks to correct the problem.

The profile line looks to be working as designed because it's designed to create a profile around all structural objects as a whole. For this situation, I would use class attribute overrides in the section viewport and make the lines thicker for the classes of those objects. Will that give you want?

OK. The walls in the file already have an issue with them and they should be fixed in the file before attempting to copy them to other files. This is the best solution I can come up with. Basically, it involved deleting the wall peaks and reentering the wall heights as needed. ScreenFlow.mp4