-
Posts
987 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
561 SpectacularPersonal Information
-
Occupation
Architect
-
Location
Italy
Contact Info
-
Skype
zetadierre
Recent Profile Visitors
5,802 profile views
-
Hello On both my Macs M1max M2max On Sequoia VW 2024 UP7 2x USB C Monitor 1x USB A Ipad Mirroring Monitor Total 4 screens. Everything going well. Excellent performance and no issues. Greetings Z
-
I can install sequoia on my M1max 16" 64 GB of Ram and do tests on 2024 and 2025 I have - a USB monitor c - A display port monitor on usb hub c - An iPad Pro first series via USB That I usually use as a second third and fourth monitor Let me know if you want to do some useful tests Greetings Z
-
this is a very important issue. I can understand it. I don't think it's right that we have to upset the working method. If a user uses the symbols correctly, I don't see why mirroring it or just using it means for the user that they can't use IFC. During work I noticed other very problematic things with symbols. The loss of all the references with the stories, the different references generate big problems. Even mirrored symbols that do not show the rest of the model have often created problems for me, even with autohybrid objects. Must I therefore think that I have to create a copy of my work 1) by deleting all the symbols 2) exporting to ifc2x3 because the 4 is not ready (we are almost in 2025!) 3) without mirroring any objects? I don't know how I could get there but I think the weight of my model would become absolutely impossible to maintain. From 10 GB it would become triple and I don't think there is a machine that can think of holding so many geometries. Unfortunately, I only have jobs of this size on my horizon. I have no alternative and I would like to understand if all these changes are really necessary or if there is hope of being able to reason to change the way we see the symbols. Or to mirror the objects.
-
Hello. Unfortunately, it was a very complicated project. Both for design and customer requests, everything had to be reduced to simple schemes. Certainly I have mirrored some elements, but it is not the windows or the walls, which are the elements that at first glance are the most problematic. The entire model is rotated and geo-referenced. I would like to start with the Understand how to assign the right colors to the Model and fix those windows that fly.
-
Hello need to share a IFC model to start a deep collaboration with other firmas after exporting option settings, all windows looks dislocated and the general aspect (view, geometries etc) look very different looks for any suggest to implement the geometries phases before get in deep to the information phases and personal IFC data records settigs thanks
-
gfilippini started following zeno
-
macOS 14.4 Compatibility Issues with Vectorworks
zeno commented on JuanP's article in Tech Bulletins
Good morning Can we consider the problem over with update 14.5? Thanks -
Stable on m2max and 14.2.1 waiting for news about 14.5
-
Good morning So are we waiting to see what happens with the release of 14.5? Thank you
-
That's very interesting. Can someone try to do this and let us know if it works or not? thanks. @astephens
-
Good morning. I have the same Mac as the author, and I haven't updated yet. If the same thing happened to me it would be really a big problem now. Is there an official position on this? Thank you
-
Hi Stefano are you able to check the same steps on Ventura?
-
VCS cloud presentations: how to view/link vgx models?
zeno replied to StefanoT's topic in General Discussion
Can I see a 2D draw on saved view=ì? Thanks for your Answers -
What a great news!
-
VCS cloud presentations: how to view/link vgx models?
zeno replied to StefanoT's topic in General Discussion
Hi Stefano. I am writing to you to share my experience and follow a possible development. I wanted to squeeze this tool to use it actively on an ongoing project, setting the xyz coordinates, as you say. It is not possible to do this and I think it will not be possible for some time. I have tried other systems even outside of VCS and I have to confirm that it is a world where there are those who can do it with millimeter precision, but they are extremely expensive services. From here I realized that VCS in AR must be used to show a kitchen furniture, a set of desks in a studio. Or a whole project but in VR. My heavy model can't handle it and I never have time to find the right balance. As for the navigation in Unity, however, I have to tell you that I found myself quite well on the desktop, but on mobile I don't remember negative experiences. But maybe I have to check if the same system is active. In short, I remember a positive general experience. In my opinion a very nice thing would be to be able to insert the sheet layers in comparison with the sectioned model with section volume. They have done great work lately but it must be admitted that from a professional point of view we are far from other BimX cone applications. Hoping for a precise xyz alignment to be able to for example see the plants on the ground on an existing structure is too much. But looking for the way to be able to integrate 2D views with 3D views might be the right direction to implement project understanding and division. -
zeno changed their profile photo
-
Can someone either guide me or redirect me, please?
zeno replied to Ryan Russell's topic in Architecture
Don't worry. It doesn't seem like a difficult project. Make sure before you have set the parameters of the Design layer and then of the single wall. Do not use the components for now. Draw the exterior wall using a new style. Try to proceed only if you understand what all the parameters you see are for. And if you don't understand a setting, ask. Saying that the whole project doesn't work doesn't allow anyone to help you😀