DomC

Beside that. We took a look at other CAD applications in the same market segment. They do not really take more advantage from multi-core CPUs than Vectorworks. They all need seperate threads for more or less the same actions. Also the gaming industry are trying to use advantage of more cores. People thinking it would be easy to just split every action on 32 cores and make it 32times faster. I think this is something where VW Inc. team makes a great job, thanks.

Hi We tested NVIDIA and AMD in comparison in a small frame on Windows. So far there were some little surprises by the result: 1. Zoom/pan differences are as expectably the same as the etablished open GL benchmarks. So NVIDIA 1080ti is fastest by zooming paning big models than 580 and would be a little faster than vega I guess. So far no surprice. AMD consumer cards have better price value than NVIDIA. NVIDIA wins the High End scope by he consumer cards with 1080ti 2. Quadro Based Graphic Cards have similar hardware and so I expected nearly same performance. But as far as I could test, the Quadro drivers performs better with Wireframe and Planar Objects. This is hard to measure but M2000 wins agains a GTX 1060 which have a much higher Hardware performance. As I told this is hard to measure ... 3. If I have a specific drawing with much of png pictures on it and I switch to this layer the first time in the session I can wait with an invidia card about 20 seconds till all ojects are visible on the screen. With an amd it takes about 5 seconds. Seems that processing the drawing to the graphic driver could be faster in some specific cases with AMD cards. A normal 2D 3D Plan have no measurable difference between amd nvidia or between High End Graphic or cheap graphic for navigation between layers/layout/classes/saved views. It seems mainly be related to the cpu single thread performance.

http://blog.vectorworks.net/moveart-wins-european-product-design-award Well done Norbert, this is also a great application of a Marionette based workflow.

Got it Your Autohybrid content has it's own origin you have to compensate this. My first script works but the autohybrid is already wrecked. by use parent node wrong. So be careful what object you put in what other object. Worst case you put them somewhere you can't delete them anymore. Autohybrid2.vwx

Hi You have to browse the container-nesting of the object to find out, how they are nested. Sometings the Content node works, sometings you need commands like vs.GetCustomObjectProfileGroup(objectHand) etc. As you can see, the autohybrid from an extrude is pretty good nested. Try first to replace the object (delete and set new object to it's parent). Maybe you have to reset object after that manipulation. Or maybe you will crash if you delete the content and do not attach a new contend (maybe start with add an additional object to the exitsting). Not tested any of this, but that's the way I would try to crack the riddle. Autohybrid.vwx

1. The Input Wrapper automatically will detect the new row and read it out. So create your additional row Maybe disconnect from space creation to get faster testing. Use pass node and "bug" method to see, what data flowing through the wires. Also goot hint is to place some valve nodes to divide the network and to not execute parts of it. 2. The "Unnest List" Node will return the additional row at e3 3. To Attach that values to the space, use the "Set Record Field". Record Name is 'Space' Field Name you can find out with a Worksheet from one of your space object. I think you want to have '11_Occupant' 4. Maybe try first to input ONE Space with the Name input and set the record field to see, if that works. Maybe you have to reset the space first. It's a popup field so this could maybe fail first try.