scottmoore Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 Can someone point me in the right direction in how to use the new numbering tool in Spotlight 2109? I am apparently far to dense to figure it out! Quote Link to comment
Wesley Burrows Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 (edited) 6 minutes ago, scottmoore said: Can someone point me in the right direction in how to use the new numbering tool in Spotlight 2109? I am apparently far to dense to figure it out! You have to select the items you want to number, open the numbering dialog, then check the boxes in the "use" field list on the left. Then for each item you check, you have to highlight it (turns blue) and adjust your numbering options. I've caught myself numerous times having the wrong (usually unchecked) field selected to modify the options and can't figure out WTF it didn't work. Edited March 27, 2019 by Wesley Burrows Quote Link to comment
scottmoore Posted March 27, 2019 Author Share Posted March 27, 2019 Ahhh, it was the highlighting bit I wasn’t following. Certainly not as intuitive in the GUI as 2018 and earlier, but more flexibility. Very much appreciated. Quote Link to comment
Vectorworks, Inc Employee jcogdell Posted March 28, 2019 Vectorworks, Inc Employee Share Posted March 28, 2019 Also you can save your numbering settings as a template to reuse in other documents and it can be used on any object in Spotlight that has a data record, such as trusses, hoists etc. Quote Link to comment
scottmoore Posted March 28, 2019 Author Share Posted March 28, 2019 5 hours ago, jcogdell said: Also you can save your numbering settings as a template to reuse in other documents and it can be used on any object in Spotlight that has a data record, such as trusses, hoists etc. I did notice that and it’s certainly a much more useful tool. I do miss the ability to see all of your numbering selections displayed at one time, but that is certainly not a huge deal at all. Just what I am used to I suppose. Much appreciated. Quote Link to comment
Greg MacPherson Posted June 26, 2019 Share Posted June 26, 2019 My numbering issue is that when I try to auto-number unit numbers the program starts with whatever number I left off with instead of 1 (which is what I entered on the numbering tab). Thoughts.? Quote Link to comment
Wesley Burrows Posted June 26, 2019 Share Posted June 26, 2019 9 minutes ago, Greg MacPherson said: My numbering issue is that when I try to auto-number unit numbers the program starts with whatever number I left off with instead of 1 (which is what I entered on the numbering tab). Thoughts.? You might double check that you have unit number highlighted blue on the left column when you enter "1". I've had the wrong field auto-highlighted, or inadvertently bumped the selected up to the wrong field bone me numerous times. It's pretty easy to do the way that tool is laid out. Quote Link to comment
Greg MacPherson Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 Wesley, thanks. I discovered that yesterday on my own. Why you have to check it and highlight it is beyond me. Quote Link to comment
Sebastiaan Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 6 hours ago, Greg MacPherson said: Why you have to check it and highlight it is beyond me. Should vwx magically know which field you are planning to edit? Quote Link to comment
Greg MacPherson Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 Previous versions of Vectorworks seemed to kano what field I was editing when I placed a checkmark next to the field. This version apparently needs the checkmark AND the highlight. Which really should have nothing to do with the underlying problem, that even when I asked the program to start numbering with "1" it would start with the the next number in the queue. The program put the number in the correct field, it was just always the wrong number. Quote Link to comment
Wesley Burrows Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 My complaint with the whole new new(ish) numbering tool is just the fact that it's so easy to inadvertently highlight an unintended field blue and not realized you edited the numbering information for the wrong field until you get unexpected numbering results. Quote Link to comment
Sebastiaan Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 27 minutes ago, Greg MacPherson said: Previous versions of Vectorworks seemed to kano what field I was editing when I placed a checkmark next to the field. This version apparently needs the checkmark AND the highlight. Which really should have nothing to do with the underlying problem, that even when I asked the program to start numbering with "1" it would start with the the next number in the queue. The program put the number in the correct field, it was just always the wrong number. They Made the new tool 100000% more usefull than the last one. However maybe an improvement would be if you could hide the record fields that you do not want to use in your specific setting. Then it will easier to see what you are doing. But you will still have to click on a field before you can fill it. 1 Quote Link to comment
Sebastiaan Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 33 minutes ago, Greg MacPherson said: This version apparently needs the checkmark AND the highlight. This is because you can check mark multiple fields. So then is logical that you have to highlight which one of the field you have to edit. But it agreed some improvements could be suggested to make it easier to recognize which field is highlighted at the moment you open the windows. Also so now that I am used to the way it works I now intuitively highlight my desired field before I start filling it. Quote Link to comment
Greg MacPherson Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 Just to see. I just highlighted the Channel field and left the Unit # field checked, then asked it to number from the left to right. The result was that the Channel fields didn't change but the Unit fields increased by 2. So the first unit now has a Unit # of 3, the second unit a Unit # of 4, etc. You have to admit, it's confusing to have to check AND highlight the field you want to enter data to. Quote Link to comment
Greg MacPherson Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 I agree with that. Having been with 2019 for the past 9 months I can't remember what the process was in 2018. And shortly we will have 2020! Quote Link to comment
Sebastiaan Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 9 minutes ago, Greg MacPherson said: Just to see. I just highlighted the Channel field and left the Unit # field checked, then asked it to number from the left to right. The result was that the Channel fields didn't change but the Unit fields increased by 2. So the first unit now has a Unit # of 3, the second unit a Unit # of 4, etc. You have to admit, it's confusing to have to check AND highlight the field you want to enter data to. Sorry this really does not happen to me. Once the fields are set right it does what I want. Quote Link to comment
Sebastiaan Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 7 minutes ago, Greg MacPherson said: I agree with that. Having been with 2019 for the past 9 months I can't remember what the process was in 2018. And shortly we will have 2020! Can’t wait too! Quote Link to comment
mjm Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 (edited) I have to say, I just use Joshua Benghiat's Savvy Sequencer (https://www.benghiatlighting.com/software/products/savvy-sequencer), a vastly powerful tool which numbers any type of object, whether there's a record or not. One can, as one will, screw up the choices often enough, but once used a few times it's my go-to tool for all sequential numbering, whether Spotlight or chairs or circles and squares. Edited June 27, 2019 by mjm grammatical clarity Quote Link to comment
scottmoore Posted June 28, 2019 Author Share Posted June 28, 2019 My process is to 1) highlight, 2) check mark 3) make adjustments. The new numbering system works well, but I do miss being able to see everything I was doing at one time as we did previously. The challenge for the developers is including all the all the various options for “numbering options” and “numbering directions” in the GUI. Some of those options are fairly wordy and require a lot of screen space. Not sure there is a good way to rectify that and still allow users to understand what they are trying to do and still include all that functionality. One of these days days when I have time to stop and just work on VW skills I am going to integrate Joshua’s and Sam’s tools into my workflow. At this point that might have to be retirement though..... 1 Quote Link to comment
mjm Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 Truth be told, as I am an abysmal typist, these kinds of tools are a huge help.I also am a big fan of the straight forward 'number position' tick box in the spotlight tool position PIO. Savvy Sequencer comes into play (all too often) when positions are non-linear. Quote Link to comment
Gaspar Potocnik Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 Just started a wishlist post, have a look and vote so it is changed as we use it. Quote Link to comment
A.D.K. Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 Useful things I've found while stumbling my way through numbering things: Set it to manual, and you don't have to have your fixtures highlighted and selected in the right order in advance. While manually numbering, you can tab through and modify fields for the next click, the same way you would while drawing. You can use the prefix to input addresses in GrandMA friendly format (eg: prefix is [universe.] then the address increments) Same prefixing can help with multi-instance fixtures. Maybe some of that comes in handy for you? Quote Link to comment
Wesley Burrows Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 This is what is stupid about the tool right here. Having seating sections selected and opening the numbering tool it defaulted to this. Why on earth, if only one thing is checked doesn't the tool automatically highlight the checked section. This is how I bone myself on the regular. Quote Link to comment
scottmoore Posted August 12, 2019 Author Share Posted August 12, 2019 I’ve not thought enough about this to really make a recommendation to the engineers, but perhaps when one checks a box, it should automatically highlight as well, assuming this is the next item you would want to modify. If you simply clicked on the item text and not the check mark it would highlight the selected item allowing for modifications as needed for any item. Quote Link to comment
Greg MacPherson Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 I think you have the right idea, Scott. When you check a line it should highlight as well if the highlight is what actually indicates what will be numbered. I can imagine that someone would want to number more than one field (unit #, channel #, address #, etc) though I can't imagine most lighting designers doing it. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.