line-weight Posted November 7, 2023 Share Posted November 7, 2023 Quite often I am trying to find the line that sits where the faces of two solids intersect. As indicated by my red arrow. (The solids have not been added together - they are two separate solids whose volumes overlap) If I want to find this line exactly (without doing a solid addition/subtraction which will make it become an edge) all my current methods are rather convoluted involving drawing intersecting 2d lines on working planes. Is there some straightforward way of finding that line (or points on it) that I am missing? Quote Link to comment
line-weight Posted November 7, 2023 Author Share Posted November 7, 2023 Here is one example of the kind of convoluted operations I end up doing, to achieve something seemingly straightforward. Hopefully the intended end result is obvious from the recording. Screen Recording 2023-11-07 at 14.25.13.mov Quote Link to comment
markdd Posted November 7, 2023 Share Posted November 7, 2023 The Analysis tool does this in two clicks. 1 Quote Link to comment
Tom W. Posted November 7, 2023 Share Posted November 7, 2023 Do you need the 2D object to snap to? Screen Recording 2023-11-07 at 14.39.53-iii.mov Quote Link to comment
Tom W. Posted November 7, 2023 Share Posted November 7, 2023 2 minutes ago, markdd said: The Analysis tool does this in two clicks. I always thought it only worked on NURBS! Quote Link to comment
VIRTUALENVIRONS Posted November 7, 2023 Share Posted November 7, 2023 12 minutes ago, Tom W. said: I always thought it only worked on NURBS! Although the standard 3D tools retain their history (add solids, etc) the underlying code is NURBS, as I understand it. That must be why EAP always converts the path to a NURBS path, but leaves the profile alone. The analysis tool should be renamed, it is such a great tool, but it's name is ambiguous. Quote Link to comment
Tom W. Posted November 7, 2023 Share Posted November 7, 2023 6 minutes ago, VIRTUALENVIRONS said: The analysis tool should be renamed, it is such a great tool, but it's name is ambiguous. Or they should correct the tool descriptions: The Help description says something completely different: Actually now I think about it I have used it on 3D solids before but had forgotten, and checking the tool descriptions made me think you couldn't... Quote Link to comment
VIRTUALENVIRONS Posted November 7, 2023 Share Posted November 7, 2023 I had never really paid attention to this tool. There are other ways to get the same result, so I had never paid attention to it for this purpose until @markdd posted a very good video on the use of the tool. There are many unknowns on how to use Vectorworks NURBS. Unfortunately the body of knowledge lies outside of Vectorworks itself, which I suppose is why there is very little on how to model cars, planes, boats, etc. Quote Link to comment
line-weight Posted November 7, 2023 Author Share Posted November 7, 2023 1 hour ago, markdd said: The Analysis tool does this in two clicks. Aha! Thanks. Have never used this tool. I will now. Quote Link to comment
line-weight Posted November 7, 2023 Author Share Posted November 7, 2023 1 hour ago, Tom W. said: Do you need the 2D object to snap to? Screen Recording 2023-11-07 at 14.39.53-iii.mov 4.14 MB · 2 downloads Yes, I suppose that should have worked for me, at least for two of the extrudes. Unfortunately I often find these "smart edges" and so on rather janky. VW doesn't reliably find them for me. I think it gets worse, the more complex my model gets. It is often seeing ghost objects and so on. I wonder if this is another thing that is worse in perspective (which I like to work in) than it is in orthogonal like in your recording above. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.