Christiaan Posted May 29, 2012 Share Posted May 29, 2012 We need support for separating cavity walls, which have two structural cores. Tick this one up as one I would have expected to see in there from the start. How do Revit/Archicad deal with this? Quote Link to comment
0 Christiaan Posted May 31, 2012 Author Share Posted May 31, 2012 (edited) What do people think is less onerous? 1. Model separating party cavity walls with two walls, so I can auto-bind the slabs to them properly and join wall cores properly? But then have to manage two walls and can't insert doors without having to create a separate opening in the other wall. 2. Model them as one wall, so I can insert doors without needing to create a separate opening in the other wall? But then have to manually manage slabs. #BIMfail Edited May 31, 2012 by Christiaan Quote Link to comment
0 bcd Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 As a workaround: Could you define & use a wall-style that treats both cores & cavity as a single component and replace it with the correct wall-style later in the project. I understand this doesn't resolve the problem nor negate the reasonableness of the request but may help in the meantime. Quote Link to comment
0 Christiaan Posted May 31, 2012 Author Share Posted May 31, 2012 Not sure how this would help Brian? Quote Link to comment
0 bcd Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Your slabs could be bounded and doors easily placed. Thicknesses & positions would be correct, Component joins would need to be done once the wall is replaced. Quote Link to comment
0 Dieter @ DWorks Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Your slabs could be bounded and doors easily placed. Thicknesses & positions would be correct, Component joins would need to be done once the wall is replaced. Slab would not always be bounded correctly. Some slabs need to go to through one core and not the other. The slab will only be correct when it doesn't need to go through it. Quote Link to comment
0 Dieter @ DWorks Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 What do people think is less onerous? 1. Model separating party cavity walls with two walls, so I can auto-bind the slabs to them properly and join wall cores properly? But then have to manage two walls and can't insert doors without having to create a separate opening in the other wall. 2. Model them as one wall, so I can insert doors without needing to create a separate opening in the other wall? But then have to manually manage slabs. #BIMfail I tried the two, and I can tell you that VW doesn't handle two walls very well, especially with wall joins. It really flips on them. I know find it easier to draw the walls as one, and clip the slabs. I know it's some work to clip the slabs, but it's easier than redoing all wall joins over and over again and finding your slabs unbounded every time. Quote Link to comment
0 Christiaan Posted June 1, 2012 Author Share Posted June 1, 2012 Great, thanks, I was dreading the two-wall idea! Quote Link to comment
0 Alan H Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Yes please, between this, and trying to work around several stepped slabs is driving me mad. Also component offsets in walls need to be independent of the wall style, this will give greater flexibility without having to unstyle the wall. Quote Link to comment
0 VincentCuclair Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 How about adding Fit Component to Roof/Geometry while we're at it...... Quote Link to comment
Question
Christiaan
We need support for separating cavity walls, which have two structural cores.
Tick this one up as one I would have expected to see in there from the start.
How do Revit/Archicad deal with this?
Link to comment
10 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.