Jump to content

Josh S

Member
  • Posts

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Josh S

  1. Hi Pat, 

     

    Sorry just seen your response now. So this sis for all dwgs we use regularly from the same source and format, i.e. standard details and OS data. The OS data we are importing is used on the start of every new project. Its a dwg of the OS for the given area. it's provided by the same person, in the same format. All the different lines, i.e. contours, building outlines, building hatch etc, are all on their own classes. Our first approach was to use the "Class and Layer Mapping" Feature to go through and remap the providers classes (dwg layers) to a new set of classes with preset settings and then select the entire import and "set the attributes by class". However, when we do this the imported settings overwrite the preset classes settings, i.e. fill colour, line colour, etc. with the imported classes settings. It seems the only work around is to import the dwg into a new document using the process above and then copy and paste into the proposed document. This can just be a more time consuming process and can sometimes create issues with Geolocated documents. 

    thanks, 

     

    Josh

  2. Hi all, 

     

    When we start any new project we bring in the OS tile which is in dwg format. Typically, we import with a prefix then go through and turn off or delete layers we don't use, as well as change the line colours to suit our preference. I want to try and stream line this for both our OS imports but also a few other things we bring in, for example standard details etc where layer/class naming is consistent. 

     

    Example 1: 

    OS file (dwg) has a layer (dwg version of a class) called "contours" when imported this comes in with the line colour and fill as back in the class manager and magenta on the drawing as an overwritten line colour with the fill on "none". We would like this to come in on a Class called, "digi-contours" with a green line colour. Now the "digi-" can be set by setting a it as a prefix or by using a mapping set. However, if I set a template file with this class already created (with the line and fill as wanted), the import will overwrite the line and fill settings. Therefore we have to go back through and change everything again. This is time consuming and frustrating, particularly if addition OS data gets bought in later into the project. The current work around of exporting to a new file then bringing into the existing document by using the new layer > import geometry option creates Georeferencing headaches.

     

    Example 2:

    We are looking to use https://detail-library.co.uk/ to support our existing standard details. They have kindly shared tips for import settings, however we would like to go one step further and blend their classes(layers) with our standard layers. Again, using standard the import layer mapping, i can change the names, but the layer settings all revert when i bring it in. 

     

    Can anyone help? Is this a workflow issue, or a setting issue? 

     

    many thanks, 

     

    Josh

  3. On 2/14/2023 at 6:33 PM, Tom W. said:

    Right-click on the door style in the resource manager + open the Plug-in Object Style Options. If the class is By Style, this is where you need to come to change it. Or set it to By Instance so that it can be edited in the OIP. There has been discussion elsewhere about making access to the Plug-in Object Style Options a bit easier...

    I think I am missing something... When creating a window style, is there an option to change the Class to "by instance" for the plug-in options, or alter existing window styles to be by instance, rather than by class?

     

    thanks!

     

    image.thumb.png.de45b0640ab2898c95544bc2b56bc019.png

  4. It's maddening that there is no way of doing it. But to be fair even if we could add a "-" to allow a heirachy system like the classes use, it would be an improvement. Being able to link them though would be great too, although I guess that is mostly done through saved views and editing from within the viewports?

     

    This is our current work around to try and keep files organised. We would welcome any tips on improving this?

     

     

    image.png.371e05e52e9d9f12f59d634d3045f954.png

    • Like 1
  5. On 10/19/2022 at 8:06 PM, mjm said:

    @Josh-gsy I will tell you the @JBenghiat's Savvy Sequencer will probably do exactly what you want but far better than you could have imagined. Check out it's window; so many possibilities! I use this so frequently it's earned a spot & a custom keyboard command on every workspace I use. Worth every penny. May I also say this tool directly addresses the need for starting character other than 1.

    Screen Shot 2022-10-19 at 11.41.54 AM.png

    Have you a link to this wizardry?

  6. @Christiaan  Bloody clip cube! cheers for this, I was just choosing which window the PC was about to go out! 

    On 5/19/2017 at 10:55 AM, Christiaan said:

    Got your file and everything looks fine at my end.

     

    Check these settings:

    View > Clip Cube

    View > Class Options

    View > Layer Options

    View > Unified View

    View > Unified View Options

     

    My bet's on Clip Cube

     

     

  7. Hi @Wes Gardner,

    that works well when creating the ceiling from and extrusion. 

    I could use the cut extrusion, to create a polygon the correct size. Create a slab from that, giving me a correct slab for the ceiling. But I suppose is there any benefit at that point to using the slab for a ceiling over a simple extrusion? 

     

    thanks, 

     

    Josh

  8. Hi,

    Anyone able to point me to a tutorial on creating a ceiling in an attic space? I can fudge it and get it sort of the right size but it's a b it of a faff. There must be an easier way! It's probably something simple I am over looking? The roof is made up of roof faces and the ceiling a slab. Ideally I would be able to get the slab to intersect with the soffit of the roof. 

    TIA, 

     

    Josh 


     

     

     

  9. 10 hours ago, rDesign said:

     

    NanaWall has some 3D files available of their bifold doors, available in SketchUp and Vectorworks formats. I believe the SketchUp versions may be Dynamic so you can make it fit your exact opening / leaf requirements; The Vw version may not offer this functionality. HTH.

      

    https://www.nanawall.com/resources/bim-3d

     

    Thanks for the suggestion. I had a look at their products and downloaded one of their doors. They do have vectorworks formats but they aren't quite as friendly as vectorworks own doors. They are more just 3D extrudes put into a symbol. Still, better than starting from scratch! 

  10. I quite like how the stories work. Really handy when sketching out designs and fiddling with levels. That said, they probably are less beneficial for two storey development. I'm new to vectorworks (and architecture!) this year after working as an SE Tech using AutoCAD and Revit. I swear, if you could smash Revit and Vectorworks into each other hard enough, you would have some great software!

  11. Yes, likewise, I have to delete the wall peaks to reset it and get FWtO to work.

     

    I've started changing how I create my upper floor walls also. Previously, I used stories and walls would go "top of slab" to top of slab over". for this I would create a "top of slab" level on the upper most story, or a false story. Now on my upper floors I tend to set walls as from "top of slab" and the upper to wall height. Then use FWtO to get the correct elevation for the roof height. This seems to make FWtO much more consistent.

  12. So I'm struggling with this at present. We tend to use a lot of 3-5 leaf bifold doors around here.

    I have looked through a few posts and came to the conclusion Windoor is the way to go, except "WinDoor is now only available as an upgrade to existing WinDoor users residing outside Australia and New Zealand. New licenses are no longer available". Is there now a solution with 2019? 

     

    Is it possible to import it as a symbol if I was to create the bifold in alternative software such as Revit, sketch-up (or even microsoft paint!)?

  13. Hi! 

     

    I'm having a right mare trying to get my walls to fit to my roof faces. I'm not sure if it's my workflow or a plug-in style for either the roof face or wall.

     

     

    image.thumb.png.bb95a0194e3b77f1ce1089f3879149c1.png

     

    Here is the settings of another example:

     

    image.thumb.png.1adf5d30360fb62e1d43a4c8cda64953.png

     

    and when I click ok: 

     

    image.thumb.png.b273645ffc341c355cfab45bd1010ad3.png

     

    Any ideas? 

     

    Cheers, 

    Josh

  14. On 7/1/2019 at 8:06 AM, Benson Shaw said:

     

     

    5 hours ago, archivectorr said:

    Bump, with the same problem.

     

     Sorry I should have updated this.

     I discovered that when I purged the drawing or some other process, it deleted the bit where the layer is associated to the story. I had to go back through each later and link it back to the story. 

    I can elaborate more tomorrow when I have vectorworks open at work if you are still stuck! 

  15. Somewhere along the line of adding the site, I lost the 1st floor walls. Then when trying to get them back I lost the ground floor too. Everything is on solid that I can see (they were a copy and paste of the ground floor and were working fine!)

    image.thumb.png.05f9b3d0d31dc91cb1c20a079b844234.png

     

    The walls are supposed to go from 300 below structure to the top of structure on the story above. This is the general set up I have used on the last couple of projects and seems to have worked fine. 

    image.thumb.png.79de53073a039abd7682f52a7a7eee7a.png

     

    image.thumb.png.19654a95d92589f6067f9d9839d170af.png

     

    Can anyone see where I am going wrong?

     

    Hopefully, I am doing something stupid and this will be a quick fix! 

     

    thanks in advance, 

     

    Josh

     

     

    image.png

  16. 12 hours ago, ASagatovVW said:

    @Josh-gsy Your second post makes me think it is a specific preference. If you go to Tools > Options  > Vectorworks Preferences > Session Tab > Make sure "Enable Online Content" is checked.

     

    That's the one! No idea when or how that got turned off! 

     

    Thanks for your help. 

     

    atb,

     

    Josh

    image.png

  17. 14 minutes ago, ASagatovVW said:

    @Josh-gsy Your second post makes me think it is a specific preference. If you go to Tools > Options  > Vectorworks Preferences > Session Tab > Make sure "Enable Online Content" is checked.

    @ASagatovVW 

    Oh that sounds promising. I'm home now so  i will try this in the morning. Thank you. 

     

    @zoomer 

    This is the folder tree I have.

    image.thumb.png.4e891029fd3381d0d65ac2a671d8f1d2.png

    and this is what I am hoping to find: 

     

    image.thumb.png.33b4c774a0a81cd897f418ffbf138a05.png

     

    I'll try the "Tools > Options  > Vectorworks Preferences > Session Tab > Make sure "Enable Online Content" option and report back. 

     

    thanks, 

     

    Josh

  18. 35 minutes ago, zoomer said:

    You need to select one of the Files inside instead of the Folder.

    Then they should show up in Preview.

    Sorry, the picture is misleading and maybe my question. Their should be more folders and many more trees listed. 

    The only tree's showing are ones I downloaded on another project.

     

    I've tried refreshing also.

     

    It's like the resource browser is not seeing the vectorworks online library? For example, if you right click the file the download option is not  there.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...