Wes Gardner

Vectorworks, Inc Employee
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

36 Great

About Wes Gardner

  • Rank
    500 Club

Personal Information

  • Occupation
  • Hobbies
    Tennis, sailing
  • Location
    land of the SUV and other stuff
  1. Hi All, Sorry for the inconvenience...I think in the conversion from old Community Board to new, it stripped away some attachments. Attached here is a tutorial as a pdf and a Vectorworks file in 2017 format with the Custom Housekeeper Schedule and a more standard Finish Schedule included. W Finish Schedules.vwx Two-Way Finish Schedule.pdf
  2. And under the next tab over, the "Display" tab, you need to check "Show Wall, Slab and Roof Components"
  3. Hi, do you have "Show Tag in 3D" checked - see attached screen shot near the bottom of the pane. Make sure to put it in a class and turn the class ON in your viewport(s). Also, in the OIP for the viewport, make sure "Display Planar Objects" is turned ON - you'll need to do this for each viewport you want your tags to show in... Wes
  4. I don't think it's a hatch...I think it's a tile???
  5. Hi Beth, If the framer does not place studs where you'd like them in the corners, you can simply 1) move the ones it DOES create into the proper location 2) duplicate a stud and place IT where you need it to build your corners as you'd like. (Sorry, forgot to "check" double top plate so the framer only created a single plate). I've attached a simple framed model as well as the set-up that created it... Wes
  6. ^ I'm in... Enhancement request submitted...
  7. Nice! Once you've modeled an element, you may want to explore the Auto-Hybrid feature to get your object to appear correctly in plan view.
  8. From your detail, it looks as if the top face and bottom face of the glulam are NOT parallel. If this is the case, it's likely you'll need to model the glulam and then, as you've suggested, save it as a symbol for repeated installations.
  9. As you've discovered, we CAN do what your photo shows - a soldier course that is FLUSH with the opening, but as you've pointed out, we cannot EXTEND the soldier course past the opening without creating a symbol - see .vwx file...I'll submit an enhancement for this much-needed parameter. Thanks for pointing this out! Cheers, Wes Header_Soldier.vwx
  10. There's a Wall Style that ships with the program specifically set up for this...I believe it's called "Virtual Wall" and yes, I'd class it/them separately so you maintain graphic control. See vwx. file attached. Does this work?? Virtual wall and space.vwx
  11. Nope...I believe you'll need to convert them to extruded elements
  12. You can also use "virtual walls"
  13. Here's another option The attached has 2 symbols. There is the top/plan view. In the 3D editing, there are front and side elevation line drawings created in the appropriate 3D planes. In section viewports, be sure that the “display planar objects” option is selected. These were easily created using the manufacturer’s DWG line drawings. Don't forget to turn off the appropriate classes in the class over rides of the viewports Kohler Toilets-2d-3d .vwx
  14. Hi Sharon, It's not really an either/or scenario. You can work with Layers without stories but not the other way 'round. Your model will build just fine using just Layers. You may want to head over to the Architecture tab and take a look at the Model Set-Up documentation. It shows you how to create wall styles that are "Story aware" vs wall styles that just use layers - BOTH are PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE means of building a model. Stories can offer a little more automation when it comes to change management as well as helping with the IFC file format. Wes
  15. Is this a trick question? :-) The result of your add surface should be the large rectangle (with the smaller shape in essence eliminated) right??