digitalcarbon Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 it just hit me...someone wants to spends $27 million for a facility to do something. equipment & material are coming and going...& they try to explain it many different situations arise during the year that change the dynamics of the facility...(when to use well water and when to use city for example) and we try to show all this with a site plan with a few arrows showing flow and we think we got it all worked out!? yikes! we are just thrashing around in the dark here! this all needs to be run in a simulation how in the world can anyone design a complicated facility w/o gaming it? what am i missing? Quote Link to comment
digitalcarbon Posted July 28, 2017 Author Share Posted July 28, 2017 i did not understand the value of simulation until i did the following video and then it hit me (and some others who saw it) things need to be simulated 3 Quote Link to comment
BCE Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 @digitalcarbon Try exporting via parasolid to multiphysics programs like Ansys, Comsol and the like, then deliver the optimised data presentations precisely to clients via apps. The problem is they (the FEM software companies) aren't interested in Artists & Architects as the profits are too low.. tho autodesk is, if you ask me not having multiphysics simulations is a shortfall in Nemetschek's overall strategy Quote Link to comment
BCE Posted July 28, 2017 Share Posted July 28, 2017 6 hours ago, digitalcarbon said: what am i missing? Simulations require Data,Proofs and trusted Real Engineers If you want answers you need to look elsewhere as you won't find them on any forum Quote Link to comment
digitalcarbon Posted July 29, 2017 Author Share Posted July 29, 2017 BCE, i think you are missing the focus of my clients interests. if you note the video above you will see that is the type of simulation is what I'm looking for & it does the job well. its just that no one can play it Quote Link to comment
Benson Shaw Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 OK, the echoing switch sound is impressive, but it provides no indication of who/how the switch is activated. The cursor moved around and the sound happened, then more cursor movement with monolog. Not clear, to me anyway, why or when the switches are activated. Would this video suffice as simulation? Seems a more detailed animation would be required displaying liquid levels rising and falling in the (2d or 3d) tanks associated with a clear graphic scheme showing response of liquid to each switch. But I like it anyway! -B Quote Link to comment
BCE Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 Simulations offer choices and involve data? IMO Clients arent interested in gaming iterations, Trial & Error,etc It's a waste of resources. they just want the best or optimal solution, proofs with Checks & Balances. Check out re-engineering simulation algorithms you aren't likely to get that here with VWs Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.