Jump to content

Ben Beaumont

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

14 Good

About Ben Beaumont

  • Rank

Personal Information

  • Occupation
    BIM Specialist
  • Homepage
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Agree Tom, I was hoping Materials would rectify this...but unfortunately not. We need to be able to align a texture to a slab. For example a timber decking texture needs to be able to be turned to match a rotated section of decking.
  2. The Wall Data Cost Index System and Cost Index Code are mapped to ifc fields Classification.Name and Classification.Item Reference respectively. They don't import into Solibri - at least I can't find them in Solibri info palette Classification tab where I would expect to find them. Am I missing something here?
  3. I'm building a library of walls based on the popular CSR Redbook wall types for our Australian users of Vectorworks. How do I know which Classification I should use? Omniclass, Uniclass etc. or can they remain unclassified??? Any ideas or pointers will be helpful.
  4. @RG Architects Adrian, I take it you've seen the attached document 'Switching from SketchUp to Vectorworks'? Also downloadable here. xlth.pdf
  5. Thank you Zoomer et al., your answers help a lot...good to know there's really no way to improve the SU-VW transfer and the limitations are essentially with SU. In Australia a lot of VW architects are using SU for their conceptual modelling then VW for 2D drafting. We're trying to nudge them across to VW for the whole lot. I can see the attraction with SU...it's incredibly fast and the ability to apply a texture by face is very powerful. I'm investigating equivalent workflows in VW. So far the push/pull with sub face is as close as I'm getting to a SU like experience. But of course we produce solids this way and textures will be applied to the whole solid - not a face...so that's a fundamental difference/shortcoming. I'm interested in a continuous pathway in VW from concept solid modelling through to VW objects then (obviously) tech drawings. Using solids we can extract polygons (via the inner boundary - paint bucket) which we can then use to 'create objects from shapes' to walls, slabs etc. It's probably a conceptual ambition to work this way...and questionable as to whether it would be practicable...but it would be really good to get others thoughts and ideas on the matter.
  6. Hello Zoomer and other contributors, how do we force SU meshes to solids? Is it a fundamental shortcoming of the SU - VW workflow that SU objects come in as meshes? An architectural model imported as meshes would seem to have limited (if any) meaningful use in the VW environment...particularly if the model needs further development in VW. What do most people do in this situation?
  7. @Dave Donley Thank you for the responses. The new iPad didn't actually ship with iOS11. As soon as it installed it behaved. Very exciting new feature. I'll be showing it off at the trade show. Regards, Ben.
  8. Hi @Alex NicolBen here from OzCAD. Just got my hands on a new 10.5" iPad Pro. I don't get the option to view the model .vgx model in AR via the Nomad app. Any ideas?


7150 Riverwood Drive, Columbia, Maryland 21046, USA   |   Contact Us:   410-290-5114


© 2018 Vectorworks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Vectorworks, Inc. is part of the Nemetschek Group.

  • Create New...