Jump to content

V. S. S.


beanus

Recommended Posts

Upsides for NNA (just guessing here):

Subscribers will purchase every upgrade, rather than skipping a cycle or two, so the income stream is more predictable - assuming subscribers are satisfied. The subscriber income is also collected at a known date, helping with cash flow predictability.

Upsides for Subscribers:

Somewhat lower costs for the initial product and future versions. Special content for free download in the subscriber web portal, such as extra library content (one example is additional 2d human figures for use directly or in image props). The first subscription (2011) had a sweetener in that the 2012 upgrade would release prior to any new subscription charges - essentially a first-upgrade-is-free offer.

Possible down sides for subscriber (guessing again):

Future update pricing may "force" a subscriber to pay more than expected.

Subscriber will have to make payment on the subscription schedule rather than waiting to purchase when convenient.

Subscriber will have to cancel the agreement to decline a version. Cancellation has notification and timing rules.

For me, it's all fine or at least OK at this time:

I have purchased every new version since VW8, so would likely upgrade anyway.

If a new version price is too big, I will cancel after that one.

The special content is not of great interest to me, but others may find it very useful.

Another upside scenario (my musings):

If the subscription model prevails as trusted by both subscribers and NNA, then maybe, hopefully, the development could stop being based on annual revisions (with attendant backward incompatibility problems) and instead become a continuous improvement stream. The development effort would not have to split between service packs and next year's top secret revision with its built in incompatibilities to prevent older versions from opening it. A new module or feature or fix or improvement is released when ready - no need to hold it back, subscribers are already paying for it.

One danger in my scenario is NNA development becoming complacent - money coming in, so why do anything exceptional? Money is OK for now, so why conceive that revolutionary, ground up rewrite every 5 or 10 years many of us wish for?

-B

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...