Gytis Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 For my cabinet and millwork shop drawings, I build a 3D model of, e.g., a kitchen, on a design layer, then use viewports and sheet layers for various plans, sections, and details. This is standard enough, I think. I also make unit-level drawings, where each cabinet, or door, or panel gets its own sheet layer with multiple viewports; to do this, I create a design layer for each discrete object. A viewport referencing the main 3D model design layer can be cropped, but not isolated to a single object, so far as I know. I could also create a class for each object and control visibility that way, though I prefer the flexibility of a design layer. My question is: as both these techniques become laborious and create large numbers of design layers/classes on top of the others necessary, is there any other, more efficient, way to structure? Quote Link to comment
CipesDesign Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 Gytis, If it was me I would use a discreet class name for each object. That way they could each be made visible/invisible in each VP and/or saved view. Quote Link to comment
Kevin Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 If memory serves me correct. There is a Vectorworks module that does cabinets. I think that it is made by the parent company of NNA. It will cost some money but may be just what you need. Quote Link to comment
Kevin Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 This software may be what I was referring to: http://www.interiorcad.com Quote Link to comment
Gytis Posted July 7, 2006 Author Share Posted July 7, 2006 Peter- yes, I've tried discrete classes, still like design layers better. It's more, uumm...discreet. Kevin-yes, I've been using interiorCAD for years (see signature). Great for the cabinet symbols, but drawing organization is still VW. Thanks for the ideas. Quote Link to comment
Vectorworks, Inc Employee Robert Anderson Posted July 7, 2006 Vectorworks, Inc Employee Share Posted July 7, 2006 Gytis, why not put your cabinet units into symbols? Quote Link to comment
Gytis Posted July 10, 2006 Author Share Posted July 10, 2006 Robert, the cabinet units are usually symbols; however, I don't understand how this helps in regards to my original post. Don't I still need a design layer to carry the solitary symbol, as opposed to the primary design layer of all assembled symbols? ... in order to have VPs of the single symbol? Quote Link to comment
P Retondo Posted July 10, 2006 Share Posted July 10, 2006 VPs can be clipped, so you can have multiple viewports from a single design layer. This could cut down on the number of layers you are using. Viewports are named, so you can find the one you want. Quote Link to comment
Vectorworks, Inc Employee Robert Anderson Posted July 10, 2006 Vectorworks, Inc Employee Share Posted July 10, 2006 Gytis, I think the best way is to use cropped VPs and classes to isolate your individual pieces. In essence, what you are doing here is hand-rolling a "parts management" system. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.