Monadnoc

Member
  • Content count

    434
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About Monadnoc

  • Rank
    Journeyman

Personal Information

  • Location
    Eugene, OR, USA
  1. I'm on VW 2017 Designer too, but I must have automatically added it and mapped it to it when I installed and forgot. It's such an old habit of mine to use it I'm sure I put it right back in. It's the "old way" of doing things I guess. I seldom use the Visibility Tool but use the Zoom Out keyboard shortcut all the time. Nice to be able to have the choice ...
  2. I don't know how to make symbols auto-rotate, but here's a link to a post that details how to make image props semi-transparent. This may solve your problem. It's down near the bottom of the post: https://techboard.vectorworks.net/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=182417&Searchpage=1&Main=36953&Words=%22Create+Mask%22&Search=true#Post182417
  3. Benson's suggestion using Wall Components is the way to go. This way any editing/changes to the wall will be reflected in the tile. Also any doors or windows that cut the wall will cut the tile automatically.
  4. I have the building model in the same file as the site model, which seems to work better for small projects. I've never really gotten into referencing external files, as it seems to have a lot of problems (based on posts I've seen on this list). I set the building model layers normally (1st floor at "0", and work up and down from there) and the site model at it's real world elevations. I then create a Design Layer Viewport of the building, and set that at the proper elevation to "sit" on the site model. I use site modifiers directly on the Site Model layer.
  5. I would use a Texture Bed. That's exactly what they do. And even though they are for "soft" surfaces, I sometimes use them for walks and drives for that very reason, they conform to the irregular surface. If you're looking for a quick and easy representation. From a distance they look fine. I usually draw the path as a polyline and right click and choose "object from polyline" then "site modifier" then "Texture Bed". You may have to update your site model after applying. And make sure "show 3d" is checked. And you may have to tweak your "z" elevation to get it to show fully. Just nudge it up a tiny bit. The "elevation" setting should stay at 0 to display correctly on your dim.
  6. If you're just bringing your models in and want to texture, light, and render a scene, I would think you could get up to speed in a few months. But to really learn all of C4D you need years (and years) to know it well. It is a much more complicated program than VW. Especially textures/materials.
  7. Hi, I am trying to create a very basic, simple custom Tool using the Custom Tool/Attribute command. I want to activate the Place Plant tool and put the resulting plant on a specific layer and in a specific class. When I try to do that the "Tool" checkbox is greyed out. I thought I'd add the CallTool call myself but I cannot find a tool ID for the Place Plant tool anywhere in Help or on the web. Does anyone know what it is, or any other way to call/activate the Place Plant tool? I am very, very, very rusty on my vector script. Thanks.
  8. I would have to agree with BaRa here ... having used both VW and C4D for a few years. I am not knocking C4D - I love it. But modeling stuff in it can be a royal pain sometimes. VW is much more user friendly and fast and accurate when modeling architectural things. Things like scale, or even being able to read info as inches AND feet. Until fairly recently, modeling to scale with precise dimensions was a stranger in the C4D world. I can't tell you how many tutorials I did where 2000 meter trees were modeled, or 400 foot mailboxes. And almost everything is done "by eye". The old "that looks about right" school of design. It is changing now as more and more architects get involved with C4D. But that is the world it came from. And the world it is designed for. So you have to adapt to it a bit. It can be frustrating. VW is for Architects. C4D is for Artists. The proper tool for the job (although there are a lot of great Architectural plugins being developed for C4D. It is trying to get a foothold in the Architectural world). I couldn't live without both. And I really, really, really, really would love them to seamlessly work together and be able to pass models back and forth easily and without losing data. But perhaps that's just pie in the sky wishful thinking for now. But oh what if ...
  9. I am at my limit with Dropbox so I've removed the two previous files. I did manage to get the file with just the textures down to under 2 mgs. I did it by deleting the photo version texture and the blue-grey procedural (which was messed up anyway when I went to check things out in detail this morning. It actually was set to use the photo too. If you already downloaded it, I would delete that texture from the file. It is redundant). Here is the vex 2011 file with just two procedural SS Textures (blueish and grayish). You will probably want to tweak the grey so it is a little more grayish). I would delete the Dropbox post but apparently it has been too long and I can't do that. Perhaps a Moderator would be so kind as to delete it for me.
  10. Here's the image with the "grey" stainless texture applied, just for comparisons. The hood and range top are a little more grey, but the fronts still seem a little too blue. I think the reflections, lighting, and angle of view effect it heavily. They will no doubt need some tweaking but at the time I just needed something fast... [img:left]https://techboard.vectorworks.net/ubbthreads.php?ubb=download&Number=11708&filename=Stainless%20Steel%20grey%20texture%20300.png[/img]
  11. This should work: Just the textures: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/76888425/SS_Textures_v2011.vwx The scene file: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/76888425/Stainless%20Steel%20texture.vwx The scene file appliances are all set to the "grey" version of the SS material (which still seems a little too blue - you may want to tweak it more). To compare the different textures just change the "Other" texture in the class "Finish-Metal-Stainless Steel BRUSHED". All stainless steel components are set to that class. Let me know if the links don't work (first time trying this in Dropbox).
  12. And here are the vwx files. The first is a cleaned up one with just the textures, the second one is the scene file, for light settings, etc. Sorry, the files are way too huge to post - 11 and 19 mgs, and all that is in it is 4 textures. A little ridiculous. I will try and post them to Drop Box when I have the time to figure out their Public folder. Sorry.
  13. I've dealt with the same issue. Here is a brushed stainless steel texture I came up with a while ago based on some settings I dug up on this forum, plus a little tweaking. I made two versions, one photo based (lower quality, for quicker renders and export ability) and one that is procedural based (higher quality, takes longer to render and can't be exported to other programs). I also couldn't decide on the perfect tint, so I tried blue, grey, and a combo of both. Here's an image showing the blue-grey version. The vwx file has all four textures in it. Version 2011. It is far from perfect, but (to me) it looks better than the brushed SS Steel that comes with VW. And the procedural uses Blur, so that should be turned on in your lighting options (actually the photo based one does too, but you can turn that off for increased render speed - I usually do). HTH [img:left]https://techboard.vectorworks.net/ubbthreads.php?ubb=download&Number=11707&filename=Stainless%20Steel%20texture%20300.png[/img]
  14. Some people use "Snap to Loci" in VW as a substitute for AutoCAD's Xline. But it drives me crazy. You'll get infinite lines everywhere you place a 2D locus. I never use Xlines in AutoCAD so I don't miss them in VW. Also not sure if STL would be close enough to them to satisfy, but worth a try.