Jump to content

nicovlogg

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

6 Neutral

Personal Information

  • Location
    South Africa

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. nicovlogg
    Copying the site modifiers from your file and using them on my newly recreated file, I get the following result: Rather than the smooth edges I see on yours Smoothing has been set to 90degrees, so it's something else that I'm missing.
  2. nicovlogg
    I think we're missing each other - I have an existing site file created using points. According to my understanding, the correct way to edit it post VW2021 is to use the 'edit proposed contours' command - you can see the suggestion here: https://app-help.vectorworks.net/2021/eng/VW2021_Guide/SiteModel1/Creating_a_contour.htm#XREF_15642_Creating_a_Contour The proposed contours do have elevation - is the missing link the grade modifier? Even adding that, I get an essentially random landscape as a result, as below, that has nothing to do with the new contours I've drawn in.
  3. nicovlogg
    Thank you @Jeff Prince, this is exactly what I'm looking for! I understand your process and stumbled onto something similar, but I should note that in the Vectorworks guide they do not suggest using site modifiers and suggest editing the proposed contours, so I followed that process. Is there a reason why I can't get it to work that way or a specific reason why that process is suggested by them as being superior?
  4. nicovlogg
    File is attached. I am working left to right. You will see that I extracted the contours, added my new 3D polys to them, and then pasted them in the 'proposed contours' model to attempt to create the landscape - the result was a mostly flat block. Even when using those contours to create a new landscape from scratch (the last site model on the right) you will see that it does not 100% follow the contours, and is flat at the bottom. Thanks for any help. Site Modelling VW.vwx
  5. nicovlogg
    Hi all, I'm working with the 3D site model tools for the first time. I've gone through tutorials pretty extensively but haven't been able to find a solution to this issue. I have an existing site model, provided by the client. I'm attempting to model some new berms and swales on this model. When I add these in 'Proposed Contours', the model does not change. My view is set to show 'proposed' so it's not a phasing issue. Would appreciate any help. I can use the 'validate 3D data' tool and get an error, but there is nothing useful about a message that says 'something is wrong' - I need to know what it is. There are no overlapping lines that I can find. Existing contours Proposed contours - new in pink
  6. nicovlogg
    OK, thank you. Unfortunately I need to work in 2021 so that solution won't help me.
  7. nicovlogg
    Alright, I've made a new video for you that shows it clearly. Screen Recording 2023-12-04 at 09.30.11.mov
  8. nicovlogg
    Opened my file today to what seems to be a bug, unless there is a setting I inadvertently turned on somewhere. A majority of items in my drawings have had their 'fill' settings changed, it seems like at the class layer. As an example, windows are now entirely solidly filled, as are walls (which previously had different fill settings depending on material), annotation tags, etc. I have a backup from 2 days ago that doesn't have this, and don't remember changing anything that may have triggered this. Any ideas? See screenshot showing windows (these windows were not edited, they are symbols, and all the individual parts that make them up had their class fill settings changed).
  9. nicovlogg
    Look carefully. The tags are there, they are just tiny. As soon as I do an action, they blow back up to normal size. When I leave the sheet and go to another, they shrink down again (sometimes).
  10. nicovlogg
    Illuminating thread! Distilled: "Could we integrate these two tools better?" "Here, look at my work" "Why would you want to? Nobody uses Rhino" "Here, look at my other work" "VW can do everything Rhino does" "Here, look at my work again" "I have never used Rhino but am sure it's not as good as VW" Rhino is an increasingly important part of many large firms' conceptual workflow. Competitors will arise and maybe some will take its place eventually. Currently, however, not adapting to that workflow means you will be left behind. For most, that doesn't matter. It's all still 2D right? 🙂
  11. nicovlogg
    Having a weird, repeating, frustrating issue with data tags (specifically window and door tags) They are scaling, on their own, at random. They scale from 0 to 1 whenever I do any of the following actions inside a viewport: Undo Delete Rotate Adding new tags etc. I have tried 'locking' the scale using the symbol override but it makes no difference. Any help would be appreciated - this means that every single publish of my sheets has 'missing' (actually just really really small) data tags. The video shows how adding a tag, deleting a tag, or rotating will cause the scale of existing tags to change. Screen Recording 2023-11-27 at 16.57.57.mov
  12. nicovlogg
    Another possibility is if the heliodon fill is set to black, it will cast a black light, aka no light. Make sure it's white.
  13. nicovlogg
    Would be great if this worked. But on my machine it creates CAD files that are missing most of the annotations and dimensions in the annotation space. Not to mention including tons of irrelevant data from uncropped design layers as blocks. FORTUNATELY sharing DWG files isn't something one does regularly as an architect... right?
×
×
  • Create New...