Jump to content

Peter Neufeld.

Vectorworks, Inc Employee
  • Posts

    337
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Peter Neufeld.

  1. Dear Jim,

    I had a user with the same problem last week. The particular symbol was Eurotruss Corn FD44-T. I received the file and can not find rhyme nor reason why it was happening. Unfortunately I was unable to replicate the issue and his hardware was sufficient. What symbols are you using? If you copy and paste just the truss into a blank file does the problem still occur?

     

    Cheers,

    Peter

  2. Hello,

    I always use https://viewer.autodesk.com which is the free dwg viewer from Autodesk. You just have to create a free account. It's easy to use but an important checker. When someone says it must be Vectorworks fault at not translating the file properly have a look in the viewer to double check and see what you've been given. Importantly you can measure objects as a reference. See the blue viewer dimension next to the 'dimension' on the plan (and it is the 2D model not paper space). It's also good to check critical files when exporting to dwg.

     

    In the dwg Import dialogue (as already described) there are no units specified but it is drawn in 'Decimetres'. I always go to 'Advanced' and then 'Conversion' in order to check the likely scale on the page. Something like this at 1:2000 is probably about right and once imported measures correctly. When you see weird numbers in the 'Fit to Page' area you know the units are incorrect. It is much better getting the scale right on import than having to rescale the drawing afterwards. If not right then try again. BTW every once in a while in Australia I see dwg's drawn in Decimetres and this was my first guess.

     

    Hope this helps.

    Cheers,

    Peter

     

     

    Screenshot 2021-08-17 at 9.31.04 am.png

     

     

     

     

    Screenshot 2021-08-17 at 9.44.54 am.png

     

     

     

     

     

  3. Did you try using the same vanishing points as I did in the second photo? In which case possibly the reference point either needs to be moved in the design layer, or in the Annotation group of the viewport.

     

    I can't suggest much else other than to say it's possible with that photo as you can see, and you might just need some perseverance. Good luck!

     

    Cheers,

    Peter

  4. 11 hours ago, rudybeuc@gmail.com said:

    I am aware of that video and used it to help set up a camera match for a view with which I had and existing building to align the guidelines. Attaches is the view where I was successfully able to use the camera match tool.

     

    As stated in the post, with this view, "I do not have a strong, boxy, existing built object with which to get a good 3 point perspective". with the photo I'm trying to match. There are no strictly vertical, horizontal in x direction or horizontal in y, to align guidelines.

     

    Dear Rudy,

    Ok sorry I wasn't clear whether or not you knew about Camera Match.

     

    I've had a quick play with that photo and managed to get something that looks ok. It might need more serious and detailed tweaking and I was guessing at heights etc. See quick render below.

     

    Cheers,

    Peter

     

     

     

    Screenshot 2021-08-08 at 2.25.05 pm.png

     

     

     

    Screenshot 2021-08-08 at 2.26.18 pm.png

    • Like 4
  5. Hello,

    Going back to the original question about integration into Vectorworks I would say why model in another program - especially Sketch Up (SU)?

    SU is a surface based modeller as opposed to Vectorworks solid based modelling. I'm not sure how you can calculate volumes and densities in SU but you can in Vectorworks.

     

    Most importantly there is a complete disconnect between the SU model and Vectorworks. I still see users with historically old fashioned workflows of modelling 3D in SU and doing 2D documentation in Vectorworks. How then, when the 3D design evolves can it flow through to the documentation? It can't.

     

    The ability to import SU models into Vectorworks for objects to populate a drawing is great. However working a concept design and evolving that in SU and then bringing into Vectorworks is an inefficient workflow - that disconnection.  Ultimately you're increasing your workload and not being efficient which after all is what it's all about.

     

    Cheers,

    Peter

     

×
×
  • Create New...