Jump to content
  • 0

Door tool: we need more fine-grained control of sizing


Christiaan

Question

In order to schedule doors correctly we need to be able to define much more about the composition of a door than we can now.

Currently we can only control the shim gap and leaf size or structural/rough opening. And these controls apply equally to the jamb and head, and assume a door leaf sitting flush with floor.

The problem with this is that it doesn't take account of the gap between the leaf and jamb for instance. Or the gap between the door leaf and the floor.

So it's impossible to accurately schedule doors because you have to add the gap between the leaf and jamb to the shim gap (in order to get the jamb thickness and leaf width to schedule correctly). And there's just no facility to define the gap at the bottom of the door so (in the UK) you just have to leave the door leaf height off the schedule (in order to get the structural opening/rough opening to schedule correctly).

We need to be able to define these gaps, so we can schedule both the leaf size and structural opening size accurately.

Link to comment

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...