Hans-Olav 344 Posted June 14, 2018 Interesting that you recommend SMB, I thought it was the other way round, AFP only We have an mac server running 10.12. and all clients on mac 10.13.5. Is it better for us to switch the sharing to SMB? Why do you choose "full control" and not " Read/write" ? We have problems with project sharing from time to time, would it be better to grant "Full control" and get less PS conflicts. 1 Quote Link to comment
Vectorworks, Inc Employee PVA - Admin 2,523 Posted June 14, 2018 Vectorworks, Inc Employee Is it better for us to switch the sharing to SMB? If you are having issues with your current setup, yes. However its more important to ensure that ONLY ONE protocol is being used. Why do you choose "full control" and not " Read/write" ? This reduces access problems in general and seems the most reliable. We have problems with project sharing from time to time, would it be better to grant "Full control" and get less PS conflicts. Yes. Quote Link to comment
Vectorworks, Inc Employee Tamsin Slatter 651 Posted July 19, 2018 Vectorworks, Inc Employee Thanks for this. Is it possible to see the setup for Windows Server users? 2 Quote Link to comment
matteoluigi 162 Posted October 28, 2020 On 6/14/2018 at 6:25 PM, PVA - Jim said: Is it better for us to switch the sharing to SMB? So, Vectorworks/my workstation does still directly communicate with the shared file? - I wished, Vectorworks would communicate with the server-app which should be able now to manage more then one person committing and refreshing changes simultaneously, right? Or does VW still communicate with the shared file, as well? Quote Link to comment
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.