seems like some progress is being made in terms of gis integration. and this is important especially as this becomes more common and expected at administrative levels.
one thing that we would like to see is a less complicated way of staying geo-referenced. yes it can be done. but, we find it a bit confounding to keep track of original coordinates, which layers are geo-referenced and not, files--such as dwgs--that get imported with different coordinates, and THEN the whole problem of 3D MODELING AWAY FROM THE ORIGIN--which requires duplicate models and moving things great distances.
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.
Question
ray isaacs
seems like some progress is being made in terms of gis integration. and this is important especially as this becomes more common and expected at administrative levels.
one thing that we would like to see is a less complicated way of staying geo-referenced. yes it can be done. but, we find it a bit confounding to keep track of original coordinates, which layers are geo-referenced and not, files--such as dwgs--that get imported with different coordinates, and THEN the whole problem of 3D MODELING AWAY FROM THE ORIGIN--which requires duplicate models and moving things great distances.
cheers,
ray
Link to comment
0 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.