Jump to content

russh

Member
  • Posts

    82
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by russh

  1. I believe (from memory) that ADT has this facility. So it should be possible. Maybe then we could also get multiple components vertically e.g. brick up to 450mm and block above, or some such. In fact defining a wall style by section (a la Revit) rather than by plan seems much more sensible to me.

  2. On the subject of the stair tool, can anyone tell me how to get the handrail to be horizontal at quarter landings? This is what I get every time - an inclined handrail, and it's very annoying:

    stair.jpg

    Or do I have to model the thing manually? Which would seem to defeat the object of having a handrail component in the stair tool. Any ideas?

    EDIT: I'm running VWA 12.5.1 on XP.

  3. I agree with Christiaan here. We dimension the structural opening, not the frame, and not the leaf. The current Dimension External Walls tool is pretty useless as well, for that reason. If I gave our bricklayers a drawing showing dims to centreline of opening, and then referred them to a schedule, I'd end up in the foundations.

  4. The way the tool works at the moment reflects the way we build timber roofs here in the UK, in that the purlins go under the rafters. However, if I were designing a steel portal framed building (a portal frame tool would be nice) then the purlins would go above the rafter. So we could do with a setting which allows us to specify the purlin location.

  5. It's self discipline, that's all. I make my revision, add the cloud to viewport annotation and then print. I don't like my design layers cluttered with notes and clouds; all my notes etc live in Viewport annotations. But the key, I think, is to make sure you actually have got a system, or procedure that the entire office will follow, in place regardless of how you actually implement it.

  6. As a one man band I don't have the same problems, in that I'm the only person working on the drawings, but agree that a date element would be an excellent idea if it was visible on the drawing. I'm not sure it would work if it only showed in the OIP. As for where you put the cloud, I've always put them in viewport annotations. It seems the most sensible place.

  7. I think there has been discussion about this, but with no real remedy. I have the same problem with 12.5.1 on Win XP taking between 40 seconds and up to 2 minutes to launch. And, like your situation, it only ever happens at first launch of the day. These days I just live with it and go get a cup of coffee.

  8. OR

    Use ADT or Revit.........

    I use 2 walls, stacked. Not ideal but I find it easier than than the alternatives. The facility to create wall styles of this nature would be a real boon, as it's not exactly a rare occurrence in our line of work.

    • Like 1
  9. I think that what Javito means is that he currently has a collection of lines which he needs to convert to a polygon or polygons. The problem is that the endpoints of some of these lines are not coincident - there are gaps between the lines. AutoCAD has a "fudge factor", a user defined tolerance, which overcomes this. I don't think VW can do this, unless someone knows how to get around the problem.

    Edit: just noticed the other thread on this. Mike is right: Chainmaker will do what you need.

×
×
  • Create New...