Jump to content

VvierA

Member
  • Content Count

    169
  • Joined

Community Reputation

4 Neutral

About VvierA

  • Rank
    Journeyman

Personal Information

  • Location
    Germany

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hello there, we use the Spotlight version that does not have the 'generate site' tool. But very seldom - from time to time - we need to model a site. Can anybody tell me how to do this with the generic 3d model tools? Thank you VvierA
  2. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think there is one simple issue with screen plane and layer plane that causes most of the confusion. And it's mostly a matter of conception or terminology. We shouldn't see screen and layer plane as two sides of one medal. Instead everything should be drawn on layer plane. And then there should be something like a checkbox like 'ignore perspective'. If you check this checkbox, it causes the object to 'pop' off, and stick to the screen or to the plane of a viewport for annotation purposes or like an image prop.
  3. @rowbear97 Yeah, I love it as well but I'd love it even more if it was usable along with class attributes override. With this I could use it to highlight data or information in my regular drawings....
  4. Hello, the scenario is as follows: Lets say you have some Design Layers named 'option 1, option 2, ... option 5' You have a sheet layer for each option and you have a list an each sheet layer that adds up some quantities of each option. The list works with a filter that searches for content on the layer it refers to, so the list for option 1 searches for elements on design layer 'option 1' and so forth. Eventually you decide to discard option 1, and you delete the design layer option 1. You RENAME all the other design layers so that option 2 becomes option 1 and so forth. The problem is: the filter in the list doesn't recognize the renaming. The result is, that every list on every sheet layer now shows the wrong data. Maybe I got something wrong, but if not - I think this is quite dangerous... Cheers VvierA
  5. Navigating through Layers via keyboard shortcuts may be a nice workaround in some situations.
  6. I think the main problem here is that the toolboxes are cluttered and in total disorder. Vectorworks urgently needs a revised user interface. It's a shame that users ask for a search tool to find the right tool. The aim should be to make it possible to work intuitively.
  7. @markdd Thank you, very interesting. I also think, that it can be a very powerful tool, but I fear, that a lot of users don't know that. @JMR Thank you JMR. Using it for internal quality control is another great thing. Of course in this case you won't miss the option to combine it parallel to class overrides.
  8. Oh thank you very much. I'll post it as soon as possible...
  9. Hi there, I was wondering which part of the VW community is using 'data visualization'. I'm asking, because I opened a thread in the wishlist section of this forum and do not get any support for it. Link to entry in the wishlist section So maybe may 'wish' isn't relevant or only a very small part of the community is actually making use of 'data visualization'... Looking forward hearing from you VvierA
  10. Hello, the title of this question may sound a little strange, so I'll try to explain... Let's say I have a network with 4 branches. Three of them depend on a choice so that depending on one of the three branches the network either draws a circle, a rectangle or a line. These three branches are selected with three valve nodes. The fourth branch is independent. I just displays some text. I want to feed it with either the string 'circle', 'rectangle' or 'line'. Do do that, I'd like to define the string by attaching it to one of the three branches that emerge each from one of the valve nodes. But how do I do this? Because the string node has only an output and not an input. I can only attach it directly to my text node. As a workaround I could of course make 3 text nodes instead of just one and attach them to 3 valve nodes of their own which depend on the same choice from the 'beginning' of the node. But this seems to me a little bit complicated, so maybe there is a more elegant way to define some input for later use? Thanks again VvierA
  11. VvierA

    Attach record

    Ah I see... thanks. And hopefully my last question for some time... if I'd like to write several record fields at once I will need a 'set record field' node for each entry. But do I also need an 'attach existing record' node and 'parent PIO' for each entry or is it possible to connect several 'set record field' nodes to the same one 'attach existing record' node?
  12. VvierA

    Attach record

    Works great, thank you. But there's one thing, I'm not sure about: what's the 'pass node' for? It's getting the handle to the parent PIO but it doesn't do anything, so I'm not sure, for what it is needed...?
  13. Hi there, I really like the data visualization feature. The problem is, that it is not possible to combine data visualization with overriding class attributes in a viewport. But this is exactly what I would need most of the time: visualization of data in a drawing that is apart from that graphically defined via class attributes. The solution would be so easy: data visualization should simply override the attributes of the specific classes that are affected and for the rest the settings for the class attributes of the viewport should be valid. What do you think? VvierA
  14. VvierA

    Attach record

    Hi Marissa, thank you again, very helpful and interesting... do I understand it correctly your new choices node gives to results: i is the integer representing the number of the option in the list and s results the string? So I can still use 'i' for a comparison in a valve node and 's' to write it in my record field...

 

7150 Riverwood Drive, Columbia, Maryland 21046, USA   |   Contact Us:   410-290-5114

 

© 2018 Vectorworks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Vectorworks, Inc. is part of the Nemetschek Group.

×
×
  • Create New...