jnr,
you hit the nail on the head when you spoke of nemetschek's reluctance to add some archicad features. i have been talking with 5 friends of mine in school and they would buy it in a second: now, they dwell in autocad land.
i have been in and out of architecture school for 8 years now and this has been the biggest problem with c.a.d. a program with dynamic views is so intensive on video ram you could draw a change by hand faster if you dont have have a really expensive machine. the programs that are fast tend to be based on a 2d drafting enviornment. this 2d enviornment looks great but does little to help a person who has the intention of publishing and updating what is in reality is a book.
the economist in me says that the wage rate and quality of an architect and a c.a.d. firm would would increase exponnentially these problems were solved. this software company could lower the price and maintain MR=MC with the increased consumers shifting the demand for their program. what would each subdivision look like if each house was uniquely designed. i know, i know, "a tale told by a fool, full of the sound and the fury and signifing nothing."
i had hoped that VWA was quark express of the c.a.d. world. i quess the newbee is schooled again.
having ranted, i have to say all this advice is great. i love it. i just finished the training cd's and started to play with VWA. it appears to work just like the last few posts describe.
you have described my frustration with archicad and reluctance to get rid of it. i am buying BOA this week and starting my first project on vectorworks. i hope it goes well. i got to see a demo of BOA this week and it looks promising.