Popular Post Kevin K Posted September 30, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted September 30, 2021 I had mentioned awhile ago (years) that something should be done to address the issue with site models, when using clip cube, appear hollow. In test driving 2022 I noticed this still has not been addressed. Also, although it is probably way too late, would it not make sense to be able to use boolean operations on site models?? Subtract solid here, add solid there, etc, etc. but still have the site model BE a site model? All the issues with 'pads overlapping' alerts, etc really gets old. Trying to facilitate complex excavations and terracing topography can become very, very difficult using the existing suite of site modeling tools. Something to consider..... 6 Quote Link to comment
E|FA Posted September 30, 2021 Share Posted September 30, 2021 22 minutes ago, Kevin K said: Subtract solid here, add solid there, etc, etc. but still have the site model BE a site model? Great suggestion! 2 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.