Jump to content

Issue with cable numbering when using %g


Recommended Posts

It seems that there is an issue when using %g and a text representation of device socket in a cable numbering schema. When matching for Src_Skt_Name or Dst_Skt_Name and using as %1, %g will not increment. For example: Src_Dev_Name^=%g %1 will produce a unique incrementing number along with a source device name in text form for each cable. However, Src_Skt_Name^=%g %1 will not increment the unique number and will produce the number 1 followed by the source socket name for each cable. At the same time, %u seems to work fine.

Link to comment
  • Vectorworks, Inc Employee

@the_fisher Well I have checked out what I can glean from the above and %g seems to work as designed.

 

%g looks at the entire cable number and checks that it is unique. So if the sockets in your device all have unique names (a good thing) then %g will not need to increment because each combination of <socket name>+ number is unique. If you want a number that increments each time the tag is used then you should use the %u tag.

 

Hope I've answered the question. Let me know if I have missed something.

 

Best

 

Conrad

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...