I wonder if it's worth moving ALL attributes to styles instead of putting them inside classes. One could still set the class properties "by style" as we do with text and lines. Why can't we do that for fills as well? I have a set of dummy classes that do nothing but control fills and lineweights, mostly so I can set the properties of autohybrid's different planes. But it just seems to create more confusion and less control since nested classes in objects render class visibility options wonky at best.
The classing system is ultimately a tag for the objects purpose, I'm not in favor of removing that. It just seems like they are trying to do too much.
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.
Question
grant_PD
I wonder if it's worth moving ALL attributes to styles instead of putting them inside classes. One could still set the class properties "by style" as we do with text and lines. Why can't we do that for fills as well? I have a set of dummy classes that do nothing but control fills and lineweights, mostly so I can set the properties of autohybrid's different planes. But it just seems to create more confusion and less control since nested classes in objects render class visibility options wonky at best.
The classing system is ultimately a tag for the objects purpose, I'm not in favor of removing that. It just seems like they are trying to do too much.
Link to comment
0 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.