mike m oz Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 Some comments on the ideal graphic view of building elements in the Live Sections: - Design sections do not require much information. - Construction sections do. Therefore in the Construction section scenario: - A wall should also show the component elements that it is constructed of. Therefore a cavity brick wall should show as a cavity brick wall and a window with a raking brick sill should show the raking brick sill. - A floor made up of timber boarding, timber joists and a plasterboard ceiling under should show this way in section. Roofs and footings are probaby going to be a bit more difficult unless the elements have actually been modelled. I can see that much of the construction detail will have to be drawn manually over the top of the sections, and to me this is an acceptable trade-off. I assume that the red 'cut' fill shown in the example can be toggled off and on so that in design sections you can have it visible and in construction sections it can be replaced with meaningful 2D linework. We really need more information on the Live Section capability so that we can understand what has been implemented, and therefore what we will be dealing with. PS - I decided to start a new topic on this subject because much of the previous Live Section topic's discussion was about other issues. Can we please not do the same thing with this topic. Answer posted by Andrew Bell in a parallel topic http://techboard.nemetschek.net/cgi/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=12;t=005399;p=0 The cut surface gets its properties from a class which is specified by the live section. So you can make a section surface class with heavy, light, or no lines, and hatched, pattern, solid, or no fill. Each live section can use a different class for that section surfacce [ 10-18-2005, 07:25 PM: Message edited by: mike m oz ] Quote Link to comment
LarryAZ Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 I'm actually really interested in this feature. It seems like most of the time I spend on a set of plans is on the section sheet and if edits to walls are required I have just been redrawing the section stuff from scratch. One thing I'm concerned about is the amount of information that must be erased from the section after it's turned into a "convert to hidden lines". All the triangular lines, extra lines around windows, etc. It is really nice to have the elevations "live" thru VPs but sometimes requires covering unwanted items with lines and boxes in annotation because they can't be erased. This method has been working fine mostly because the final render version is quite realistic. It also pretty easy to fix the annotation after walls have been moved on the floor plan. I'm hoping this will make sections as easy. I really do look forward to trying it out. Quote Link to comment
digitalcarbon Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 I?m skeptical about the idea that hot 3d sections can really be used for CD details. The bottom line is line weights. Line weights are what make a detail look good. Ok, hatches also. I have cut 3d sections in the past and spent so much time cleaning them up, that I have left off using 3d at all. Except for massing and structural framing issues. I?m aware that I can just draw in 2d. While I can see the benefit for hot sections in design phase I cannot see how in the world they will ever be used for CD details. Quote Link to comment
islandmon Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 The way I see it there are two issues to be considered: 1) Design integration & functionality . The ability to maintain the integrity of the data regardless of the changes. 'Live ' Sections should be able to provide this essential benefit. For 3D work they will be indispensible and an important checksum. 2) Presentation is something else all together and depends on a multitude of factors over which NNA has no control whatsoever. The idea that Live Sections wills somehow know intuitively what the structural requirements are and the methodolgy used to represent them in various premutations of the Design/Build process is asking way too much. But hey, if they can find a way to make it happen ... go for it. My only real concern is how much overhead these 'living' sections will require... will they eat me out of house & home. Quote Link to comment
Vectorworks, Inc Employee Andrew Bell@NV Posted October 18, 2005 Vectorworks, Inc Employee Share Posted October 18, 2005 quote: Originally posted by LarryAZ: One thing I'm concerned about is the amount of information that must be erased from the section after it's turned into a "convert to hidden lines". All the triangular lines, extra lines around windows, etc. Good news, Larry, walls in live sections will not have visible split lines in hidden line rendering. Also note that if you have stacked walls (for example, two floors of a building) in a hidden line viewport, the line between the walls on the different floors is no longer visible in hidden line. Quote Link to comment
mike m oz Posted October 19, 2005 Author Share Posted October 19, 2005 Larry AZ - If the Live Sections and Elevations work as they should then we will no longer have to convert them via Hidden Line Rendering. [ 10-19-2005, 12:01 AM: Message edited by: mike m oz ] Quote Link to comment
bc Posted October 19, 2005 Share Posted October 19, 2005 Ok it's my turn...... Mike, thank you for being there and all your contributions to this forum. I have limited knowledge and experience with this my only and beloved program..VW Arch/RW. I have experienced in the past the reality that sometimes VW functionality is only at 80%. Witness the stair object, dormer editing, dead sections, as well as some 2D oddities that all were helpful but frequently lead to workarounds and remedial drafting. I would love to stand corrected on this point, but I believe this is what we're going to get with the live sections...only 80% which won't be good enough for some (probably eventually including me) but will be well received by me none-the-less and NNA will get my cash because it will be worth it overall. If we must detail wall components in section for now, then so be it. Life will still be better. Mike, to help with my sections, in the past I have modeled my foundations by stacking two walls on top of each other with one the shape of the footing and one the foundation wall and both textured concrete. These can be moved around as easily as regular walls and show up in sections and models. I wish NNA would give us a foundation wall tool with fully editable footings and walls all in one wall but until then.....can you suggest a better way to model the footings? I realize I'm straying a bit from the live section discussion but what more is there to discuss until we have the program running or someone from NNA demonstrates this feature fully? Quote Link to comment
mike m oz Posted October 19, 2005 Author Share Posted October 19, 2005 The secction examples shown in the Whats New in 12 PDF document are orthoganal views. Are perspective section views possible? Would it be possible to post some examples so that we can see how the sectioning actually works? Quote Link to comment
Travis Posted October 19, 2005 Share Posted October 19, 2005 Mate, you're as anxious as a hound before the hunt! The horizon will start to lighten here in about a week. Then we'll be able to see through the mist enough to go after the prey. A little dose of patience, perhaps with a spoonful of sugar? As someone else noted recently, I do appreciate your contributions to these boards. Between you and Alanmac, tho, there are days I wonder if you've got a little too much time on your hands. All the best! [ 10-19-2005, 11:07 AM: Message edited by: Travis ] Quote Link to comment
Sean Flaherty Posted October 19, 2005 Share Posted October 19, 2005 Mike, Section viewports must be an orthogonal view. We're pulling together some more detailed information about live sections now, I'll post again when it's available on the web page. Quote Link to comment
LarryAZ Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 quote: Originally posted by mike m oz: Larry AZ - If the Live Sections and Elevations work as they should then we will no longer have to convert them via Hidden Line Rendering. Mike - I currently annotate on VPs of my 3D model. If not rendered it is hollow. Quote Link to comment
Sean Flaherty Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 A short training movie for live sections was posted to our knowledgebase today for those looking for more information on how this feature works: http://kbase.nemetschek.net/index.php?ToDo=view&questId=73&catId=19 Quote Link to comment
Ariel Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 Thanks for the link, Sean. All I can say is "woohoo!". Hope sectional perspectives aren't far behind. Ariel Quote Link to comment
Ariel Posted October 21, 2005 Share Posted October 21, 2005 Btw, is it possible to 'freeze' the section viewport into a 2d only drawing? Quote Link to comment
Vectorworks, Inc Employee Andrew Bell@NV Posted October 21, 2005 Vectorworks, Inc Employee Share Posted October 21, 2005 quote: Originally posted by Ariel: Btw, is it possible to 'freeze' the section viewport into a 2d only drawing? You can convert any viewport to a group of 2-D elements, including a section viewport. The specific elements you will get depend on the rendering mode (lines for hidden line, bitmaps for OpenGL, etc.); section viewports will have lines and polygons for the sectioning surface. Quote Link to comment
blimey Posted October 21, 2005 Share Posted October 21, 2005 "woohoo". I'm very impressed by the demo. Also notice the fact (as said in another topic) that the lines between floors do not appear any more. That's really good. I was also very impressed by the speed of the action. I guess the demo is in "real" time. I runs really smooth. What is the configuration of the computer (it seems to be a mac, what should be the equivalent pc configuration?" Quote Link to comment
michael john williams Posted October 21, 2005 Share Posted October 21, 2005 The live section demo is great! But [sorry] it looks more like a presentation tool rather than a detailing tool. Is this true? Or can wall cavities, brick, block, cladding, etc be added? Quote Link to comment
Chris D Posted October 21, 2005 Share Posted October 21, 2005 Hang on, Hang on....Live Sections?? I've just watched the video and it seems this is a half-baked implementation of live sections at best. Why on earth choose to display the sections straight into a viewport? How can I then add linework, hatches and notes to the section and then use it for details in multiple other viewports? A section view should be like any other view - Top view or Front view. The section needs to be usable within the Design Layers side of a file - maybe as a 2D 'image' like a bitmap (albeit a live one), but certainly not as a viewport. Why can't a section view even be fully 'live' so that I can actually change the model in section view? I think NNA are mixing up a section view as a 'drawing' to go straight on a sheet, with a useful section 'view' through a model as a design aid, a modelling aid, and as a base for detailing. Quote Link to comment
Travis Posted October 21, 2005 Share Posted October 21, 2005 Chris, I've always thought of a Section as part of the construction drawing set, so it seems most logical to have it incorporated with Viewports. One can easily add linework, hatches, etc via Annotations. For Details that are referenced several times in a drawing, we typically draw them in another file and then WGR them in. I know you can't WGR a Viewport, so the detail is generally drawn in 2D on a Design Layer complete with all the "detailing" (hatches, fills, notes, etc). If you'd like to use a Section Viewport as a base for detailing, Andrew points out above how easy it is to convert it to linework. I don't quite see how the modelling process is limited by not being able to make revisions in the section "view" you imagine. If a wall needs to be revised, I've got to revise the whole wall (or divide it into segments) not just the portion I might see in section view. I can understand that being able to see the revision, perhaps in a split-screen window, might be useful. Having done some pretty limber mental gymnastics to create reasonably "live" section Viewports in 11.5, I'm thrilled to have the functionality built-in (and much more intuitive, I might add) that I see in the demo. I'm curious if there's a fully-baked cake somewhere against which you're comparing this one to determine it's half-baked status? Look forward to playing with v12 directly. Good luck, Quote Link to comment
michael john williams Posted October 21, 2005 Share Posted October 21, 2005 The blurb I am getting is: 'Vectorworks 12 makes it easier to turn your designs into construction drawings' I do not see this in the demo and will be some what reluctant to spend ?300 plus on the upgrade if it does not do the job. I think I would rather spend it on Sketchup. Quote Link to comment
RubenH Posted October 21, 2005 Share Posted October 21, 2005 I think this live sections it's the best i ever see. Every plan that we make in our office come up from a 3d model. If you want to understand the big potential in production of the live sections you have to know how to develop a project in 3d, wich is the basis of all this. Start thinking in 3d, then finish in 2d, not in reverse. Sorry for my english. [ 10-21-2005, 10:36 AM: Message edited by: RHF ] Quote Link to comment
dhruv Posted October 21, 2005 Share Posted October 21, 2005 It is rather dissapointing that Live 3D sections are not there in VW12. They make a execellent communication tool. So far i had been remodelling specific areas in my design to so that they look like 3D cut away sections. Had nemetschek implemented this, VW12 would have been a very serious competitor to ArchiCAD. Quote Link to comment
Vectorworks, Inc Employee Andrew Bell@NV Posted October 21, 2005 Vectorworks, Inc Employee Share Posted October 21, 2005 quote: Originally posted by michael john williams: The live section demo is great! But [sorry] it looks more like a presentation tool rather than a detailing tool. Is this true? Or can wall cavities, brick, block, cladding, etc be added? Not automatically. You can edit the viewport to add annotations for all of these items, and the new Polygon from Outer Boundary mode for the Polygon Tool makes it easier to make polygons to which you can apply the appropriate hatches, etc. Quote Link to comment
michael john williams Posted October 22, 2005 Share Posted October 22, 2005 We do and we are - we think 3D and all our plans are drawn in 3D - but we also build 3D and you can not construct from these live sections. I hope to be proved wrong. Quote Link to comment
Kevin Posted October 22, 2005 Share Posted October 22, 2005 Thanks Sean for the movie. Great demo and great features. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.