Jump to content
  • 69

Stair Tool Rehab for 2050


bc

Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
16 hours ago, line-weight said:

Yup, stair, doors, windows - potentially the 3 most useful of any of the parametric tools for architecture - the ones which if they worked well, could really save a lot of time and tedium, yet they are all fairly awful and don't seem to have been improved in any significant way over the past several releases.

 

Couldn't agree more.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • 0

Using VW2017, my file has crashed five times while trying to use the stair tool. It got so bad that the file would crash upon re-opening without me doing anything. How am I supposed to earn a living, when I am spending my time watching my file crash, (and then take quite a long time to reload), only to crash again.

Link to comment
  • 0

I've been waiting since MiniCad for the stair tool to be usable. It's frustrating to watch a new version come out every year with new tools, new features and still the stair tool gets left behind. I know they added some new stair layouts, but part of the consistent problems are the details.

1. This one, to me, is  the most important:

       Designing a set of winders or circular stair without being able to set the travel line. By code, the stairs need to be a minimum at the travel line. I'm sure it varies from place to place, but it needs to be determined in order for the treads to be laid out properly, unless you're on of those that just draws in any stairs to make it look good, but when it comes time for building them, they don't fit into the given opening. I've tried laying out a set of winders with the stair tool and it was not even close to code. Setting where the travel line goes will mean the winders will be drawn at a minimum (I'll use 10") rough run. Where I am, the travel line is measured 12" in from the narrow end of the stair.

2. In addition to the travel line, code requires a minimum depth at the narrow edge of the stair. In Massachusetts it's 3" minimum, in New Hampshire it's 6", so designing stairs for both states is difficult using the stair tool for these two reasons alone. There needs to be more input to have a more accurate output as well as flexibility.

 

As part of the dialogue box, there should be an input for minimum tread depth at the travel line, and a minimum tread depth at the narrow end of the tread or winder.

 

3. Make the dialogue boxes in an order of importance for the design.

The first things you need to know are floor to floor height, maximum riser height, number of risers, minimum tread depth AT THE TRAVEL LINE, minimum tread depth at the narrow end of the tread or winder, tread thickness, nosing depth (see #4), stair width (or radius, inside or outside).

4. The tread depth should not be the finished tread depth but the rough run (or as some refer to as the "going"). Determine the rough run (according to code) and then the tread overhang (or nosing depth) should be the additional part of the tread that extends past the riser.

 

It's no wonder people are confused when they use the stair tool. For me, it's not confusion, it's frustration not being able to add information necessary to create the stairs accurately.

 

5. I would like to see a stair tool that has the ability to place newel posts and balusters based on custom symbols created by the user, like the extensive library I have been working on for years. Similar to the "Fence" tool that Vectorworks added last year or the year before, have a library of parts you can plug in and exchange. 

6. Custom rail profiles. If you have a custom profile you should be able to add it to a library of other profiles, and as Vectorworks creates a rail, there should be the capability of using any 2D profile.

6. Rail height: How about setting two rail heights. Rake rails separate from balcony rails. Again, rake rail code (IRC) is 34-38" residential, balcony rails are a minimum 36". Allow the user to set these separately as it will help in the design elements and accuracy of the post heights.

7. Create stair from 2D plan: What if you have a stair design with a lot of different shaped winders? Laying out all of the tread shapes (in the rough) and then selecting them to create a 3D model.

8. The ability to draw open stair treads with returns

 

There are many more, but another time.

I'm not saying stairs are easy to program because there is a ton of math and details that go into it in order to get it right, but there needs to be some additional places for input if we're going to draw them accurately. I am constantly getting stair drawings from architects that will not work due to code issues. At that point they are not "working" drawings...    just drawings.

 

IMO, I don't think we should have to wait until 2020. For me, that's a 20 year wait and I've seen a ton of new tools in that time introduced when the stair tool gets ignored year after year. Isn't it more important to have a great stair tool, especially in an architectural program, rather than a subdivision tool that makes fancy blobs and gets major improvements the second year. I think there has been plenty of time to improve this tool, even if just one of anyone's wish list items were granted each year, it would be a much better tool by now. Get rid of the confusion of "Which stair tool should I be using" and make one consistent, useful tool. Maybe two if the curved stair tool needs to be separate.

 

 

 

Edited by mac@stairworks
Link to comment
  • 0
21 hours ago, mac@stairworks said:

I've been waiting since MiniCad for the stair tool to be usable. It's frustrating to watch a new version come out every year with new tools, new features and still the stair tool gets left behind. I know they added some new stair layouts, but part of the consistent problems are the details.

1. This one, to me, is  the most important:

       Designing a set of winders or circular stair without being able to set the travel line. By code, the stairs need to be a minimum at the travel line. I'm sure it varies from place to place, but it needs to be determined in order for the treads to be laid out properly, unless you're on of those that just draws in any stairs to make it look good, but when it comes time for building them, they don't fit into the given opening. I've tried laying out a set of winders with the stair tool and it was not even close to code. Setting where the travel line goes will mean the winders will be drawn at a minimum (I'll use 10") rough run. Where I am, the travel line is measured 12" in from the narrow end of the stair.

2. In addition to the travel line, code requires a minimum depth at the narrow edge of the stair. In Massachusetts it's 3" minimum, in New Hampshire it's 6", so designing stairs for both states is difficult using the stair tool for these two reasons alone. There needs to be more input to have a more accurate output as well as flexibility.

 

As part of the dialogue box, there should be an input for minimum tread depth at the travel line, and a minimum tread depth at the narrow end of the tread or winder.

 

3. Make the dialogue boxes in an order of importance for the design.

The first things you need to know are floor to floor height, maximum riser height, number of risers, minimum tread depth AT THE TRAVEL LINE, minimum tread depth at the narrow end of the tread or winder, tread thickness, nosing depth (see #4), stair width (or radius, inside or outside).

4. The tread depth should not be the finished tread depth but the rough run (or as some refer to as the "going"). Determine the rough run (according to code) and then the tread overhang (or nosing depth) should be the additional part of the tread that extends past the riser.

 

It's no wonder people are confused when they use the stair tool. For me, it's not confusion, it's frustration not being able to add information necessary to create the stairs accurately.

 

5. I would like to see a stair tool that has the ability to place newel posts and balusters based on custom symbols created by the user, like the extensive library I have been working on for years. Similar to the "Fence" tool that Vectorworks added last year or the year before, have a library of parts you can plug in and exchange. 

6. Custom rail profiles. If you have a custom profile you should be able to add it to a library of other profiles, and as Vectorworks creates a rail, there should be the capability of using any 2D profile.

6. Rail height: How about setting two rail heights. Rake rails separate from balcony rails. Again, rake rail code (IRC) is 34-38" residential, balcony rails are a minimum 36". Allow the user to set these separately as it will help in the design elements and accuracy of the post heights.

7. Create stair from 2D plan: What if you have a stair design with a lot of different shaped winders? Laying out all of the tread shapes (in the rough) and then selecting them to create a 3D model.

8. The ability to draw open stair treads with returns

 

There are many more, but another time.

I'm not saying stairs are easy to program because there is a ton of math and details that go into it in order to get it right, but there needs to be some additional places for input if we're going to draw them accurately. I am constantly getting stair drawings from architects that will not work due to code issues. At that point they are not "working" drawings...    just drawings.

 

 

 

Completely agree with all this.

 

Another problem with the current stair tool is that what it produces in 3d is made up of polygons rather than solids. So it's not even possible to get it to build you a "nearly right" version, convert to solids and edit manually.

Link to comment
  • 0
On 9/29/2017 at 7:34 AM, bc said:

I agree rDesign.  It's just that I felt that 2020 would be reasonable considering it may NOT  already be in the works.

 

Surely it has to be in the works. I still use the custom stair as the new stair tool can be so limiting. As it turns out the last project I ended up putting the stair on its own layer, modelling all the railings/cappings etc separate to the stair object then using fills and classes to hide certain aspects so it would appear correctly on the upper and lower levels - rails and all.

Link to comment
  • 0

Well, yes a good stair tool has been requested since I can remember.  It appears the latest rendition was their best shot at appeasement given their other funding priorities.

We've all developed our ways to deal with it.  I merely wished that NNA would.

The stair tool is pretty much the main reason I started calling it VectorWorksAround.

If they can pull this off, then I will come around, but I didn't post this to rant.

Macstairworks and Lineweight make excellent points and those are something to shoot for yet what ArchiCAD has done is a game changer in the order of a paradigm shift.

That's why I added some time.

I should have requested they make this the next absolute priority.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • 0

Generally the Stair tool as it is works well for me in most cases.

 

In some cases it is easier to use it flight by flight and do custom

landings to have better control. Or create a manual first riser

when extension needed.

 

It is not so fun to use and won't create complete stair cases by one click.

Railings do not always what you would expect.

And as far as I remember, the 2D appearance doesn't resemble the 3D

actual geometry and does not work as a underlay to model landings

in 3D.

Link to comment
  • 0

Yes, something seems to be wrong with the railings.

There is (or was) some ugly vertical offset for the last riser.

I think that was an other problem with VW 2014-16 (?) where there was

some hick up with railings where they meet on a landing of a U-Stair.

 

Or maybe just not for me because I used single stairs for my U-stairs (?)

 

But it is quite tedious if you want stair ends at special positions, when the stair origin,

from where it extends for changes, is always at the wrong side ;)

Link to comment
  • 0

There should be more control over the railing offset as well. A railing isn't always the same distance from the edge of the stairs. If a rail terminates into the center of a 2x6 wall, the offset will be different than if the rail terminates into a 2x4 wall. Post placement and centering of rails terminating into end walls dictate the offset of the rail.

Link to comment
  • 0

It's been discussed elsewhere that windows and doors could be rolled into one tool that does both, because there's not always a clear distinction whether something's one or the other.

 

I wonder if there could be one tool that could produce ramps, stair flights, landings, maybe even just pathway segments, all of which could have one set of controls including for things like handrails and all of which could join one another intelligently.

 

Why? One set of controls to learn. One tool for the developers team to keep up with, instead of different tools doing similar things diverging in capability, control methods etc. And also because these elements are often used in conjunction with each other. And it would make it easier to set up something like a  handrail style, which you might want consistent throughout a building, and apply it to different elements consistently.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • 0
23 minutes ago, Markvl said:

Next release?  Who knows?

 

Its embarrassing at this stage....... 

 

“For this release, we listened closely to our customers and balanced new innovations with exceptional quality and performance improvements,” said Vectorworks CEO Dr. Biplab Sarkar. “Specifically, in Vectorworks 2019 we concentrated on our customers’ most common workflows and usage patterns to increase their overall productivity with Vectorworks products across the board.”  

 

Stairs, windows, doors are not part of architects common workflow?! do not need performance improvements?! ....  

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...