Long overdue is an upgrade to "Convert To Polygons" . Every release I wait to see if "Convert To Polygons" is improved and isn't. It would be nice if "Convert To Polygons" did a better job. If I convert a cube to polygons, when done, it would be nice to have 6 polygons 1 for each face.and that's all, instead of a bunch of lines and polygons which is just a mess to deal with. Also the option to only end up with the polygons that are seen, i.e delete the back and bottom polygons of the cube. For me a "Convert To Polygons" that works the way you would expect, would save me and my detailers hours a day in clean up nonsense. It would also help a great deal when exporting eps files. The files would be much smaller and the guy receiving the file won't be complaining either. Better convertion would also make the new option gradient worth using.
Another benefit would be printing, less stuff to send to the rip, which means, less of a chance of choking the spool because of a lot of extra garbage it doen't need.
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.
Question
Fuge
Long overdue is an upgrade to "Convert To Polygons" . Every release I wait to see if "Convert To Polygons" is improved and isn't. It would be nice if "Convert To Polygons" did a better job. If I convert a cube to polygons, when done, it would be nice to have 6 polygons 1 for each face.and that's all, instead of a bunch of lines and polygons which is just a mess to deal with. Also the option to only end up with the polygons that are seen, i.e delete the back and bottom polygons of the cube. For me a "Convert To Polygons" that works the way you would expect, would save me and my detailers hours a day in clean up nonsense. It would also help a great deal when exporting eps files. The files would be much smaller and the guy receiving the file won't be complaining either. Better convertion would also make the new option gradient worth using.
Another benefit would be printing, less stuff to send to the rip, which means, less of a chance of choking the spool because of a lot of extra garbage it doen't need.
Thanks
[ 01-13-2003, 12:37 AM: Message edited by: Fuge ]
Link to comment
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.