Jump to content

Mac M2 Render Speed Test


Don Seidel

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, zoomer said:

So we all have to buy M1 Mac Studio Ultras from now on ?

or buy 2 M2 Pro Mini's . One can render while you continue work on the other. Wouldn't that, by definition, beat the fastest machine on the market? 😄

 

You get what you pay for, mostly. Everyone's needs are different. I always buy the most machine I can reasonably afford and never look back. Of course everyone wants a killer machine, but do you need it even if you could afford it? If my projects get that big and that complex, yes. Otherwise, nope...ego is talking. The Aston Martin will get you there in style, faster than the Toyota Camry. But the Camry will still get you there. 

 

M2 Mac Studios are probably 3-4 months out

  • Like 1
Link to comment
12 hours ago, Don Seidel said:

There is a BUG on the time clock at the bottom of the screen. Sometimes (not always) if you click away to another program or desktop, the stopwatch on screen reports a much longer time than reality...you have o render again to see correct time.

 

That improves my speed all the way to 38:59.  I think I'm still the "winner".  I'll post the hardware cost if & when I can find it.

 

On 1/30/2023 at 11:18 AM, E|FA said:

39:55 - 2019 iMac 3.7 GhZ 6-core Intel Core i5, GPU Radeon Pro 580 X 8GB, 40GB RAM

 

OS 13.2, VW 2023 SP3

 

Link to comment

I don't understand the "value" figure.

 

For example M2 Max macbook pro gets 0.0016 and i9 iMac gets 0.0028. They both cost about the same but M2 Max is loads faster. This suggests lower number = better.

 

But ...

 

M1 Macbook Pro (0.0051) and M1 Mac Mini (0.0110) take roughly the same time for the render, with M1 Mac Mini being half the price. This suggests higher number = better.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, line-weight said:

I don't understand the "value" figure.

The “value” factor, the start of this topic, was to show how much processing power you can get vs the money spent. Any laptop costs a premium for the feature of portability. You also have monitor, keyboard and mouse all in one. So it’s less relative value for the cost…. Generally you can buy a more powerful desktop for less money than the laptop. But people are willing to accept the laptop premium because they must have or really want a portable system.

 

Headless Macs, on the other end, don’t come with monitor, keyboard or mouse. ( It’s funny Apple describes “accessory kit” as included with the Mini and Studio Macs… the only accessory is a power chord). So while there are needed peripherals to operate the machine, the collateral cost can be mitigated by using 3rd party products, or extra used products one may have around.

 

so the Mini, as intended, is a budget solution. One can always spend more, and have a more powerful, faster system.  But can one get a budget Mac that will work well with VW ? Clearly the answer is yes for many users, now that the M2 Mini has arrived.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Don Seidel
  • Like 1
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Don Seidel said:

The “value” factor, the start of this topic, was to show how much processing power you can get vs the money spent. Any laptop costs a premium for the feature of portability. You also have monitor, keyboard and mouse all in one. So it’s less relative value for the cost…. Generally you can buy a more powerful desktop for less money than the laptop. But people are willing to accept the laptop premium because they must have or really want a portable system.

 

Headless Macs, on the other end, don’t come with monitor, keyboard or mouse. ( It’s funny Apple describes “accessory kit” as included with the Mini and Studio Macs… the only accessory is a power chord). So while there are needed peripherals to operate the machine, the collateral cost can be mitigated by using 3rd party products, or extra used products one may have around.

 

so the Mini, as intended, is a budget solution. One can always spend more, and have a more powerful, faster system.  But can one get a budget Mac that will work well with VW ? Clearly the answer is yes for many users, now that the M2 Mini has arrived.

 

 

 

 

I get the basic idea of value - just meant that the numbers in the table don't seem to make sense.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

fascinating post Don, no interest here on the community at all!  😉

 

I'm seeing:

14:14 on MBP M1 Max 64GB

13:04 on  Alienware x15 R2 i9 32GB RTX 3080Ti 8GB $2700

 

I agree the easy part is comparing price/speed.

Deciding value is another story - but I do think 1000 renders/price  (t/$) isn't quite it.

 

Link to comment
6 hours ago, line-weight said:

M1 Macbook Pro (0.0051) and M1 Mac Mini (0.0110) take roughly the same time for the render, with M1 Mac Mini being half the price. This suggests higher number = better.

The price of the MBP includes the keyboard and screen while the Mini is only the base box.

 

The value calculation determines the number of renders you can finish in one day as the numerator. So the Numerator increases with the speed of the machine. The demoninator is the price of the machine. So the denominator increases with the price of the machine. Which is normally related to the speed of the machine. Maybe I need to break out laptops separate from stationary machines so we don't get confused by the "extras" included in the laptop price.

Link to comment
7 hours ago, line-weight said:

I don't understand the "value" figure.

 

For example M2 Max macbook pro gets 0.0016 and i9 iMac gets 0.0028. They both cost about the same but M2 Max is loads faster. This suggests lower number = better.

 

But ...

 

M1 Macbook Pro (0.0051) and M1 Mac Mini (0.0110) take roughly the same time for the render, with M1 Mac Mini being half the price. This suggests higher number = better.

 

Above^^^ in bold is what doesn't make sense. Those two conflicting observations.

 

If numerator = speed and denominator = price, then a high "value rating" number = better.

 

If a high number = better, then the M2 Max MBP should be getting a higher value rating than the i9 iMac. But it doesn't in the table. I think a calculation is going wrong somewhere.

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Christiaan said:

128 GB RAM may have added $1100 to the cost of the 2019 iMac i9

 

But who would buy RAM from Apple,

especially for on of their last last (and easy) user upgradeable offers.

 

Around the time I build my PC, I did a similar table.

Also mainly for CPU Rendering only, R21, later R23, for iMac Pros, Mac Pros,

Ryzens, my Trash Can.

And abandoned after I added my Mini (Native and Rossetta2)

 

Columns were :

- number of cores

- estimated CPU prices

+ Cinebench single core (CAD)

+ Cinebench multi core (Rendering)

> Cinebench Points (multi core) per Core (Scaling)

> Cinebench Points (multi core) per $ (Value)

 

Aim to do one again for M1s, M2s and Ryzen again soon.

Link to comment

Basically we could also just use our Cinebench Results for this task.

(RW Rendering = C4D Rendering and single core points should resemble

overall App speed)

I think Cinebench's clock is trustworthy out of the box..

 

What Cinebench does not (opposed to 3D Games) is shifting much memory.

So there is not much advantage for 3800 GHz RAM vs my slow and outdated

2400 MHz RAM, although a Ryzen in real world would profit very much from

highspeed RAM.

So a bit unfair for not using M Max and M Ultras high memory bandwidth.

 

But none of all Apple ARM SoCs looks like it was build for any old school

CPU Rendering anyway.

And that Apple ARM works great with VW overall, you can already see by

our weak device "M1 Pure" performance.

Edited by zoomer
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...