Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by mac@stairworks

  1. Anybody from Vectorworks have any advice?
  2. Am I missing something? How do I get a custom rail profile to sit on top of the post instead of going through the post? I even set the insertion point at the bottom of the profile. The stock profiles sit on top. Also, is there a way to make the top of the post be above the rail (IE: a block top post)? Edit: I also noticed the dialogue box dimension settings don't match the actual model. Distance to floor is correct but "distance to top rail is not. Neither is the post height.
  3. Yeah, that's pretty much it. That's why I'd like to see the thumbnail/list view to have the option to view the resources you work with most. If I select "all resources" I have to scroll through tons of line types and text styles. At least with the old browser you could minimize those resources and sort of hide them from view. Anyway, thanks everybody.
  4. Thanks Tom, I do create folders. The problem is, some miscellaneous items don't make it into a folder, and the ones that don't might be a different resources like text styles, textures and line types. If they were listed by type you could scroll though them in some type of order. Andy, thank you. Yes, you can sort by type in list view. So how is that not possible in thumbnail/list view? It just seems like another "improvement" with baggage that will linger. _C_, yeah, I'm looking for the old way it worked, but it worked. I like the new layout, I think there's a lot more room to work, but just fix the little things,
  5. Is there a way to remove this pink plane from showing up when I'm in 3D view?
  6. Two things I would like to see improved with the resource manager. If there is a way to do these things, could someone please let me know? 1) It would be better to be able to check off (add check boxes to the left of each resource)which resources you want to view instead of one resource or all of them. symbols/plug-ins, and textures are what I use most but from what I understand you can only view one at a time or you have to view all resources. 2) Is there a way to sort the resource manager list by type instead of alphabetical? Having all of the resources showing at once, they are all over the place because of the naming. Visually, it's very difficult to find what I'm looking for. Screenshot shows "all resources". There is no sense of order.
  7. When I change from top/plan to 3D I get this... And if THAT doesn't work? if NA doesn't want to fix it, give us a "more workarounds" button.
  8. Thanks for your time everyone. Zoomer, this is just going from tp/plan to Right Iso. No editing mode or anything. Sorry, I should have made that clear. Pat, I will try your suggestions if I can't get it to work, I just don't want to have to go through resetting everything just for one setting. Just wish simple things like this would just work instead of spending half of my day fixing someone else's work. And now NA is asking for $400 a year for upgrades. How about going back and fixing all of these workarounds before adding more to the mess. Does anyone else have a problem with the trim tool? It only works for me if I zoom in ridiculously close otherwise the line, circle or whatever gets deleted.
  9. If I go from top/plan to 3D view I still have to manually change the setting from wireframe to Open GL. Is there yet another loophole to get this setting to work right? What am I missing? The last few versions have not worked for me so I 'm wondering, has anyone experienced this?
  10. Is it possible to rename some tools or options based on the region? Similar to versions for different languages. The stair tool has terminology that is not region specific either, ie: the "run" of a stair in the U.S. is known as the "going" in many places. (sorry to use the stair tool as an example, sore subject) Just a thought
  11. Thanks guys, I appreciate your time.
  12. Can anyone tell me how to turn off the axis lines in 3D? Sometimes I get the pink plane as well. This is on my Windows machine. Thank you
  13. Screen Plane. I'm sure some people use both or all of them. Again, depends on how you use the software. I hope they are able to fix your issue. I agree it's frustrating. Many times I find "screen align" has changed to "layer plane" on its own. It's annoying when you continue to draw and find out you've been drawing on the wrong plane, and then have to go back and find all of the objects that were drawn on the layer plane.
  14. I agree with the inconsistency of the tool but I don't think screen aligned should be eliminated. I do all of my stair drawings in 2D due to the stair tool being so useless, so just because some people don't use certain features doesn't mean they should be eliminated. Not everyone uses the software the same. Hey, I don't use the custom cabinet tool, maybe they should get rid of it...
  15. Have you tried using the rounded rectangle tool?
  16. Thank you DBruhnke, I noticed the symbols I just created yesterday show up in the preview window, but one that I imported from my previous library did not. I tried to edit the one I imported and it has disappeared. I opened the symbol library file, saved it and closed it. Now those items show up in the preview window. So if you migrate your symbol libraries, you have to open them and then save them to see a preview? Has anyone else had to do this to get a preview after migrating your libraries? I did use "add file to favorite" to add each of my libraries, I just never had that happen before. Anyway, thank you for your help.
  17. Am I missing something? If I highlight a library symbol, is there a way I can see a bigger view of it? The way way these symbols appear in the library are harder to see than the old resource manager. Thanks
  18. 20 years this year and still waiting. I just hope that if there is ever a new stair tool, yes a new one, not a bunch of band-aids on the old one, it will be amazing.
  19. I don't feel raising the cost of VW is justifiable when we finally get a functioning stair, window and door tool that should be updated and improved on an annual basis. Anticipating these improvements every year is getting pretty disappointing.
  20. Taproot, you make some good points, but I think a tool as important to an architectural program as the stair tool shouldn't have to get enough votes to be upgraded. It should be upgraded on a regular basis as stair parts and design elements evolve. Today we have cable rail systems, metal balustrades are becoming more popular now that cheaper parts are available, glass panels, and all we have now is a rail with no profile to it and straight, plain balusters that can not be replaced with anything that has any detail to it unless you model your own and place it manually. This tool is in desperate need of an overhaul. There is so much to be fixed, I hope it gets some attention sooner than later.
  21. There should be more control over the railing offset as well. A railing isn't always the same distance from the edge of the stairs. If a rail terminates into the center of a 2x6 wall, the offset will be different than if the rail terminates into a 2x4 wall. Post placement and centering of rails terminating into end walls dictate the offset of the rail.
  22. Agreed, just added to the stair wishlist.
  23. I've been waiting since MiniCad for the stair tool to be usable. It's frustrating to watch a new version come out every year with new tools, new features and still the stair tool gets left behind. I know they added some new stair layouts, but part of the consistent problems are the details. 1. This one, to me, is the most important: Designing a set of winders or circular stair without being able to set the travel line. By code, the stairs need to be a minimum at the travel line. I'm sure it varies from place to place, but it needs to be determined in order for the treads to be laid out properly, unless you're on of those that just draws in any stairs to make it look good, but when it comes time for building them, they don't fit into the given opening. I've tried laying out a set of winders with the stair tool and it was not even close to code. Setting where the travel line goes will mean the winders will be drawn at a minimum (I'll use 10") rough run. Where I am, the travel line is measured 12" in from the narrow end of the stair. 2. In addition to the travel line, code requires a minimum depth at the narrow edge of the stair. In Massachusetts it's 3" minimum, in New Hampshire it's 6", so designing stairs for both states is difficult using the stair tool for these two reasons alone. There needs to be more input to have a more accurate output as well as flexibility. As part of the dialogue box, there should be an input for minimum tread depth at the travel line, and a minimum tread depth at the narrow end of the tread or winder. 3. Make the dialogue boxes in an order of importance for the design. The first things you need to know are floor to floor height, maximum riser height, number of risers, minimum tread depth AT THE TRAVEL LINE, minimum tread depth at the narrow end of the tread or winder, tread thickness, nosing depth (see #4), stair width (or radius, inside or outside). 4. The tread depth should not be the finished tread depth but the rough run (or as some refer to as the "going"). Determine the rough run (according to code) and then the tread overhang (or nosing depth) should be the additional part of the tread that extends past the riser. It's no wonder people are confused when they use the stair tool. For me, it's not confusion, it's frustration not being able to add information necessary to create the stairs accurately. 5. I would like to see a stair tool that has the ability to place newel posts and balusters based on custom symbols created by the user, like the extensive library I have been working on for years. Similar to the "Fence" tool that Vectorworks added last year or the year before, have a library of parts you can plug in and exchange. 6. Custom rail profiles. If you have a custom profile you should be able to add it to a library of other profiles, and as Vectorworks creates a rail, there should be the capability of using any 2D profile. 6. Rail height: How about setting two rail heights. Rake rails separate from balcony rails. Again, rake rail code (IRC) is 34-38" residential, balcony rails are a minimum 36". Allow the user to set these separately as it will help in the design elements and accuracy of the post heights. 7. Create stair from 2D plan: What if you have a stair design with a lot of different shaped winders? Laying out all of the tread shapes (in the rough) and then selecting them to create a 3D model. 8. The ability to draw open stair treads with returns There are many more, but another time. I'm not saying stairs are easy to program because there is a ton of math and details that go into it in order to get it right, but there needs to be some additional places for input if we're going to draw them accurately. I am constantly getting stair drawings from architects that will not work due to code issues. At that point they are not "working" drawings... just drawings. IMO, I don't think we should have to wait until 2020. For me, that's a 20 year wait and I've seen a ton of new tools in that time introduced when the stair tool gets ignored year after year. Isn't it more important to have a great stair tool, especially in an architectural program, rather than a subdivision tool that makes fancy blobs and gets major improvements the second year. I think there has been plenty of time to improve this tool, even if just one of anyone's wish list items were granted each year, it would be a much better tool by now. Get rid of the confusion of "Which stair tool should I be using" and make one consistent, useful tool. Maybe two if the curved stair tool needs to be separate.
  • Create New...