Jump to content

Vlado

Vectorworks, Inc Employee
  • Posts

    756
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Vlado

  1. 1 hour ago, sbarnett said:

    Now That I have been threatened to be removed from the forums I will Clarify for all.

     

    I have no idea about that, I'm just trying to answer your concerns here. Maybe contact the forum admin about this.

     

     

    1 hour ago, sbarnett said:

    and when speaking to Company policy and Speaking as the Company "You" are a cog in the wheel.

     

    But still, I wanted to give you some feedback, as it is important to us (the company and me) what our users need, and we try to make Vectorworks better and more useful.

    • Like 2
  2. @sbarnett I wouldn't agree with you. Our main goal is to think about our users. In case of the third-party plugins, we operate on partnerships. With partner plugins/features, you won't see this at all.

    The "Export grandMA2 Setup (XML)" is from our partner MA Lighting Technology GmbH, and they already are providing Vectorworks 2026 version. We'll even add their plugin to the Help -> Install Partner Products menu in Vectorworks very soon, so you can get it installed without having to mess around with files.

    • Like 2
  3. Hi all, I understand the frustration, but still an unknown plugin is a security risk, and clicking "enable" is too easy in the rush of the moment.

    If you see this dialog, the plugin developer to provide validated plugin for Vectorworks 2026. The process is trivial.

    The "Export grandMA2 Setup (XML)" already has a Vectorworks 2026 version. You need to download it instead of reusing the old version.

    The "WinDoor" plugins are something Vectorworks provides, and unfortunately there is a problem there, which will be fixed in Update 1 and it will be no longer reported.
    You can work around the problem now by replacing your "CredentialsVectorworks" file that is located next to the application. There are the updated files that you should replace it with
    Mac: https://cloud.vectorworks.net/links/7y7Kq1BrghFGFA8n/
    Win: https://cloud.vectorworks.net/links/EqpmWYZaF2s2tRRb/

    Again, WinDoor will be fixed by Update 1.


     

    • Like 3
  4. 4 hours ago, Claes Lundstrom said:

    I wrote them for my personal use and for use within my team? That is really, really bad !

    Yeah, as @Jesse Cogswell said, if you have them editable, they will not be required to have credentials.
    If for some reason you do encrypt the plugins, then it's trivial. Contact @LDraminski directly, and we can give you a file to include along side your plugins.

  5. Vectorworks 2026 introduces the requirement for script plugins that are encrypted/obfuscated and SDK plugins to have a satellite credentials file that defines who is the developer of the plugins is.

     

    More information can be found here: https://github.com/Vectorworks/developer-scripting/blob/main/Common/Tasks/Info/PluginCredentials.md

     

    Note: this doesn't apply for open source VectorScript or Python scripts.

  6. The image provided shows the WinDoor plugins, which pare developed by Vectorworks. You can install the new versions from the "Help -> Install Partner Products" menu command. This will install a version that is compatible with Vectorworks 2026.

    Unfortunately, there is a problem with these plugins that is inside the Vectorworks' credentials file, which will be fix soon. Until then, you can replace the "CredentialsVectorworks" file in the Vectorworks application's "Plug-ins" one (it already exist, override with this new one) as a temporary solution:


    Mac: https://cloud.vectorworks.net/links/7y7Kq1BrghFGFA8n/
    Win: https://cloud.vectorworks.net/links/EqpmWYZaF2s2tRRb/

    When you replace this file, the WinDoor feature you installed from Help -> Install Partner Products

  7. 4 minutes ago, PenChiselCamera said:

    Interesting… Blender is a pretty serious piece of software. There’s no technical reason VW can’t be similarly developed for iPad. 

    Yeah, technically it is absolutely possible, difficult but possible. Then the question that remains is that if the expense would make sense. Especially with the trend where laptops are getting more and more like tablets, and tablets are getting more and more like laptops.

  8. @PenChiselCamera Thank you for your reply, I appreciate the details.
    In fact, this matches to what we're trying to do, and the direction we're working at the moment.

    Have you seen the "Share Document" feature in Vectorworks 2025? This is our first step to allow users to share the drawing with other people with the purposes of measuring and review, with comments you can see back in Vectorworks. It's a first step, but we are moving in this direction.
    https://app-help.vectorworks.net/2025/eng/VW2025_Guide/Export/Sharing_documents_in_the_cloud_document_reviewer.htm

     


     

    • Like 4
  9. Hi @bcd, thank you for your input.


    The goal is to replicate Vectorworks so we've chosen similar user interface and naming. Then we display information from Vectorworks about this object, and depending on the case you might need something or not. There are currently options to control what data gets exported at record format granularity.

     

    Regards,

    Vlado

  10. ... scaling problems are typically due to incorrect coordinate system, but the WKT looks the same.

    Maybe you can getting more points and plotting them in Vectorworks to see how they relate to the imported image. This will give you more confidence that it's not the WKT.

     

    Another way might be if you export a shapefile with prj file, and then import it in Vectorworks in a new file [so that it sets the Georeferencing]

    • Like 1
  11. @PNWPaul I was able to import it somewhat where it is supposed to go, but unfortunately it is not perfectly fitting. And I'm not sure what's wrong. Anyway, here is what I did:

    ok, so these are called cartesian coordinates (i.e. easing and northing).
    1110896.65E
    1313006.9N
    Note they are measured in linear coordinates, where lat/long are measured in degrees.

     

    After I setup the Vectorworks drawing geo-referencing with the WKT above, these cartesian coordinates gave me:
    -48.91273585 lat
    -122.070105424 lon

    These checks are very easily done in Vectorworks using the Stake tool, and the .Set Geolocation" button.
    Then with the Geoimage, it all seems to line up to your image from the original post:
    image.png

     

    Then I was able to import the .las file, making sure the center checkbox is off, and select Feet for units as this coordinate system uses feet (note, it doesn't really matter what units the Vectorworks document is in)
    image.png

     

    Then the image didn't fit at all, it was way to far, and comparing the location of where it should be to where it is (in cartesian coordinates) it seems like it's off by scale of 1000.

     

    So then I just scaled the Point Cloud object by factor of 0.001:

    image.png

     

    And that put it at the stake point, but it is still slightly off from the geo-image background:

     

    image.png

     

    I have no idea why this is happening. I'll keep poking it, and see if something comes out.

    • Like 2
  12. @PNWPaul It looks like EPSG:4152 is not the correct coordinate system, as it looks like this is only spherical coordinate system. The images you provide shows a projection added to it, but it is not clear what is the EPSG if that projection.

     

    I managed to pull the data out from the image and setup this WKT that is based on EPSG:4152 spheroid plus the projection parameters from your images. See below for the text of it.

     

    However, I'm still not able to align your file with it, as it's not clear what units the LIDAR file is using. Yes, it should be automatic, but it should be possible to be done manually. I've tried several settings but shouldn't guess it.

     

    Do you know the latitude and longitude of the location where the file is supposed to be? That can give us a clue what are the correct unit configuration.

     

    Regards,

    Vlado

     

    PROJCS["custom",
        GEOGCS["NAD83(HARN)",
            DATUM["NAD83_High_Accuracy_Reference_Network",
                SPHEROID["GRS 1980",6378137,298.257222101,
                    AUTHORITY["EPSG","7019"]],
                AUTHORITY["EPSG","6152"]],
            PRIMEM["Greenwich",0,
                AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],
            UNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433,
                AUTHORITY["EPSG","9122"]],
            AUTHORITY["EPSG","4152"]],
        PROJECTION["Lambert Conformal Conic"],
        PARAMETER["latitude_of_origin",45.33333333333334],
        PARAMETER["central_meridian",-120.5],
        PARAMETER["standard_parallel_1",45.83333333333334],
        PARAMETER["standard_parallel_2",47.83333333333334],
        PARAMETER["false_easting",1640416.667],
        PARAMETER["false_northing",0],
        UNIT["foot",0.3048,
            AUTHORITY["EPSG","9002"]],
        AXIS["Easting",EAST],
        AXIS["Northing",NORTH]]

     

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...