RubenH

The problem (quit) Tails is that Vectorworks 2008 isn't fully compatible with Snow Leopard, since Snow came after Vectorworks 2009. http://kbase.vectorworks.net/questions/712/Vectorworks++%26+Mac+OS+X+Snow+Leopard+V+10.6

I think it's happening but not complete: In vectorworks 2011 if you make a Design Layer Section Viewport and renders it with Open GL you get live updates... I think is just a question of time...

Vectorworks 2011 really shines. The concept of flexible BIM is getting more sense. http://architosh.com/2010/09/vectorworks-2011-a-preview-in-boston/

Ariel: Can you upload a graphic example, please?

I think as Dworks said: one consolidated place...

Take a look of Vectorworks 2011... I think is one of the best updates ever! If you want a real idea of what is happening inside Vectorworks, take a look: http://architosh.com/2010/09/vectorworks-2011-a-preview-in-boston/

I think this release is superior in many things. It's obvious the consistency of snapping in 3d, with only one cursor (a wish from many). The wall tool has is components in 3d that relates with slabs components (also in 3d). All objects are 3d and maintain it's attributes (can't stop imagine the futures that this will bring). I see many wishes that were listened and accomplished in this update. Others are easily deducible (Parasolid is emerging)... in future releases. Is good to see the level of compromise that Nemetschek Vectorworks has put in this release. I think Vectorworks is right on track.

Excelente work! Here's the link to their main page: http://www.paredespino.com/

As you say Shaun that's the logic. That's the way I see the development of Vectorworks since Parasolid adoption. Every time is more clear that Nemetschek Vectorworks are in a very interesting track. I think that what you can read in many interviews and documents from Nemetschek Vectorworks since the inception of Parasolid. I think is not an easy task, that's why it isn't instantaneous. Let's wait to see at what point of the track is Vectorworks.

I have already made those kind of models, inside Vectorworks. For plans there are many solutions. Neither of them difficult. In that kind of projects is where Vectorworks really shines. Many students of mine came with that kind of geometry... and they love Vectorworks.

Thanks...

I think the Real Life videos are excellent. The only thing is the sound in the vectorworks interface, that mixes with your voice...

I think there's no problem. Is an issue of the pdf format and the way it draws on screen. Always look perfect at actual size or print.

Look's awesome!

Agree...

"Drawing with code just doesn't make sense. I'm a visual person and I draw visually." +1... but is a surprise, to see that many of the projects (no conventional ones), are developed using scripting. Vectorworks needs a modern script approach not get rid of it. Some softwares, has this points already sorted out (or in the working) : scripting (sometimes phyton, or mel (maya)) and in other side parametric bubbles (like Xpressos in CINEMA or Grasshopper in rhino)...

Thanks Vincent for clarify my points... my english isn't good enough. I've been testing ArchiCAD, for every release, since version 10, and I think they're stuck... their unique advancement is, precisely, Teamwork, something that's no necessarily biased for medium or small firms. Big firms maybe (normally teams go from 8 to 10 architects for one project). If you look into their forums, you will notice the discomfort of ArchiCAD users. Some users said (here in my land) that ArchiCAD brings in last version more of the same (Nothing). Vectorworks has adopted Parasolid in version 2009 (and upgrade that not many people really understand, at least in my surroundings), and the advancement in the model calculation is huge in version 2010 (need to do a very huge model to see this). I think ArchiCAD is far behind that (2 two 5 years of development) until you see major changes in the core development (unless they're on track already). ArchICAD only have polygonal model. They don't support nothing more: solids (real ones), and nurbs. No direct modeling also. Is not so simple, that's a big load that they carry on... One hammer can't make a building (ArchiCAD only have objects). I see a promising future for Vectorworks, and their approach of integrating Parasolid as modeling kernel is one of the most important things. Right now important firms tends to use PLM softwares like Catia or Unigraphics NX, or industrial solutions like Rhino. That's the focus on important architectural schools, too. Because solutions like Unigraphics NX already solved the problem (including interoperatibility) of modeling and productivity. Is just a question of time. Vectorworks have proven to be an invaluable resource in our practice, beating other solutions in the market and positioning us at the front. And yes... I want better interface, better collaboration tools (like Teamwork, maybe)... but I think we aren't stucked, like others... I don't want to see version 2008 anymore in my life... Excuse my english... It tends to be rude (I don't want that).

Shaun: I'm no trying to cut it. Just making a pointing for a solution that's working here.

Yes, it is easy and possible in Vectoworks 2010: 1. A model organized with symbols (master model)... each symbol becomes a User. 2. Referencing the symbols in a empty document... (I call them satellite documents). Many as Users. 3. Every change in referenced symbol will save in master model. Is an options in Vw 2010. (Save in the original file). Note: make a global symbol for each layer. A complete floor for example.

It is possible in Vectorworks 2010.

I've had received from NNA.

I think this should help you: http://kbase.vectorworks.net/questions/457/Create+a+Custom+Title+Block+and+Configure+it+to+Interact+with+the+Object+Info+Palette

Thanks for the lesson Raymond! I'll let you know the advancements with this. Thanks again.

Thanks Raymond. Thanks Pat. This is the working script: {FROM HERE} Procedure RandomScaleSelected; Var H1: Handle; R1: Real; X1,Y1,Z1 :Real; xr, yr, zr :Real; mrr :Boolean; Begin H1:=FSActLayer; While H1<>Nil do Begin R1:=Random*4/10+0.6; if Get3DOrientation(H1, xr, yr, zr, mrr)then begin Get3DCntr(H1,X1,Y1,Z1); Set3DRot(H1, 0, 0, -zr, X1, Y1, Z1); Set3DRot(H1, 0, -yr, 0, X1, Y1, Z1); Set3DRot(H1, -xr, 0, 0, X1, Y1, Z1); HScale3D(H1,X1,Y1,Z1,R1,R1,R1); Set3DRot(H1,?xr, yr, zr, X1, Y1, Z1); H1:=NextSObj(H1); End; End; RedrawAll; End; Run(RandomScaleSelected); {TO HERE}

Thanks anyway... When I made the modification to the script and it didn't work I though it was my fault. Let's wait... Thanks's for your help.