Cristiano Alves

I forget the file. sorry. Truss Report Bug.vwx

Hello everyone, I’m trying to generate quantity reports for truss, but only some truss objects appear in the report, while others are missing. To rule out file corruption, I created a new document, copied all the truss objects, and recalculated the report — but the result is exactly the same. As you can see in Image 1, there are many horizontal trusses, all from Prolyte. However, in Image 2, you can see the generated report: The list is much shorter than expected. Some truss types appear that are not even present in the drawing and the quantities are incorrect as well I’ve attached the file so you can take a closer look. What am I doing wrong here, and what can I do to make sure all truss objects are correctly included and counted in the report?

Thank you all of you for this help. I’m getting close to my goal, however I’m not very happy with this result. My NURBS curve has an angle set to 5, so I wouldn’t expect it to generate these hard edges / sharp segments. Additionally, my 3D Conversion Resolution is set to Very High, so I don’t think this is a display resolution issue.

I don’t have a lot of experience with 3D modeling in Vectorworks, but I’ll try to approach it the way you suggested. What I noticed when using Polylines converted to NURBS is that I can only draw them on a single plane. For example, if I draw on the XZ plane, how can I then introduce some variation in the XY plane to make the shape more organic? Another question: My NURBS curve has very sharp corners, even though I have the curve angle set to 5. What could be the reason for this? Initially I also contacted @VIRTUALENVIRONS privately about this, and by working together we were able to find a good solution.

Hello everyone, I’m looking for guidance on how to create an organic structure in Vectorworks, specifically related to the modulation and layout of flexible neon tubes for a stage environment. The goal is to design a structure with organic, non-geometric shapes, where the neon tubes flow naturally through the space and are integrated into a stage design. At this stage, I’m not looking to share reference images publicly — I mainly want to understand which tools, workflows, or approaches make sense for this kind of work in Vectorworks. More specifically, I’d like to know: Which modelling tools are best suited for creating organic paths and structures Whether this should be done natively in Vectorworks or partially in another software and then imported Best practices for controlling geometry, repetition, and modulation of objects like neon tube elements If anyone has experience with similar workflows, or would be interested in helping me understand the process or providing this as a service, I’d be happy to continue the conversation privately.

Didn’t help, unfortunately. I already know that Help page and, sadly, it doesn’t cover this kind of case. But thank you for sharing it; rereading it did remind me of a few things. Hello @TomWhiteLight This didn’t really help in my situation because what I want is to “paint” all LED Panel objects using Data Visualization. If I use a specific parameter-based criteria, it only works for the objects that currently match that value. When I later add a new LED Panel object, it won’t automatically be included in that Data Visualization, unless I manually adjust its parameters to match the criteria. What I’m trying to achieve is something like “Apply this Data Visualization style to all LED Panel objects, existing and future, regardless of their individual parameters.” So far, I haven’t found a way to do this in a consistent way. @Scott C. Parker I’m still at the same point. I haven’t found a solution to use Data Visualization on all objects of a given type (in this case, all LED Panel objects). I would really appreciate help to understand what I’m doing wrong, or if there is some limitation with LED Panels and Data Visualization that I should be aware of. I’ve attached a sample file so that you (and the rest of the community) can take a look. Can you help me figure this out?

From what I can see, this seems to be a recurring problem for many users over several years (first thread 2022). Excellent explanation from @Jesse Cogswell. , and thank you @Tom W.. for reminding me of all these threads. But… why hasn’t this been fixed yet? (I haven’t seen anyone from Vectorworks commenting on this issue.) It feels like the rules for how the rulers behave in a drawing really need to be updated. It would make far more sense if the ruler reflected the user’s chosen origin, especially if the user intentionally moves the User Origin for a specific workflow. If there is a need to move the origin — and Vectorworks even provides that functionality — then it seems completely logical that the rulers should adapt to this offset. This issue has a huge impact on my workflow, and I’m sure it also affects anyone working with geo-referenced files, where moving the User Origin is required.

Hello everyone, I have a stage structure built with Layher scaffolding, and I need to create a report listing all the pieces required(standards, ledgers, diagonals, decks, etc.). My first thought was that these objects would appear under the Rigging category so I could generate a report the same way I do with truss or hoists — but they are not included as Rigging Objects. So my questions are: 1. How can I add Layher scaffolding pieces so they appear in the Rigging tab? Is there a way to classify them as rigging items, or is this not supported? 2. Even better: how can I create a custom tab such as “Structures – Layher Pieces”? Something similar to how Vectorworks shows: Truss Hoists Rigging components …but for Layher components, so I can run reports and count pieces properly. If there is a recommended workflow (records, custom OIP, attaching a specific data set, etc.), I would really appreciate some guidance. Thanks! Cristiano

Hello Justin, The project file is attached. It’s actually strange to add accessories now, because I can’t figure out how to snap the accessories to the line points of the fixture. Also, when I switch the view from Top to Side or Front, the fixture geometry disappears, so I can’t see what I’m snapping to. Acessories Moving Head Forum.vwx Hello TomWhiteLight, I tried to find this “Base” field in the Records, but I couldn’t locate it. Could you explain where exactly it is or how to access it? Thank you! Cristiano

Hello everyone, I’m trying to create a Data Visualization profile to “paint” all the panels of my LED Wall. My criteria looks like this: After that, I select all the objects and set the override color to blue: However, it doesn’t work. None of the LED panels appear blue in the drawing. I’m not sure what I’m doing wrong. Is there something specific that I missed? Any help or clarification would be really appreciated!

VW 2026 MacOS 15,7,2 Like you can see on the print screen First moving: P=0. T=0 Second moving: P=90 T=0 Thrid moving: P=90 t=90 How is the best way to report this?

Hello everyone, Sometimes, I’m having an issue with the Z value (height/elevation) in my projects. It keeps changing unexpectedly, and I can’t find a way to reset it back to the correct reference. I prefer to work in a very symmetrical and precise way, so I frequently use the XYZ fields in the Object Info Palette to place objects accurately. I understand how to change the XY drawing origin, but I don’t understand why the Z origin is shifting or how to force it to return to my intended “zero”. What makes it even stranger is this: The Working Plane axes appear to be in the right place, But the ruler/coordinate readout shows a completely different Z measurement. You can also see this difference in the screenshot I attached. I’ve also included a simple project file with this problem so you can inspect what might be causing this behaviour. Could someone explain why the Z origin keeps shifting, and what I should do to reset or stabilise it so that it matches the Working Plane and rulers? What is the correct workflow in Vectorworks to ensure the Z elevation stays fixed and predictable? 20250924 . Z Plane Problem.vwx

Hello Scott, If I find the fixtures directly in the Resource Manager and double-click them to add them to my design, the object is inserted as a regular symbol, not as a Lighting Device. Am I doing something wrong, or is there a different workflow I should be using?

Hello, I’m using the Lighting Device Tool to add some Special Effects devices and assign their patch and position. In Vectorworks 2026, when I try to search by name inside the Lighting Device Tool, no Special Effects devices appearin the results. However, if I search in the Resource Manager, all the devices are there: Entertainment → Special Effects → Library Brands I tested in Vectorworks 2025, and the workflow works normally. In 2025, adding a Special Effects device is exactly the same as adding any other Lighting Device, and it appears correctly in the search. This is what Im seeing on VW2025: Lasers, Lighting, SFX This is what Im seeing on VW2026: Just Lighting So I’m not sure if this is: -a bug in VW2026, or -a new workflow where Special Effects and Lasers are handled differently. Can someone confirm how this is supposed to work in 2026?

Sorry, I didn't see this message before. But I'll add a simpler project here later to see if we can make the Worksheet I need. Still, right now I have a problem that I would like to solve Lista de Fixture types: This formula gives me the list of all the Devices (column C) that I have in my drawing. ='Lighting Device'.'Inst Type' I want to make a table that gives me only a certain type of "Instrument Type", In other words, for example, I wish I could have a table where only the "Clay paky Sharpy" appeared. Something like: ='Lighting Device'.'Inst Type' == 'Clay Paky Sharpy' How can I make it?