Jump to content

Jim S.

Member
  • Content Count

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About Jim S.

  • Rank
    Greenhorn

Personal Information

  • Location
    United States

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Has anyone found a way to get the interior elevation tag to re-link to the viewports? A coworker rearranged the file and used the copy and paste method instead of the OIP sheet layer method and all the tags show nothing but an incorrect sheet number.
  2. Does anyone have any interesting updates on this topic now that we have been using 2020 for a bit? It does not seem that VW gave one of the most used tools for a drawing set any thought of an upgrade for 2020. Would be great is a VW employee could chime in on this issue...
  3. It is great to know about each viewport having its own clip cube! Since this has to be modified in the design layer I thought it was a global setting. All of this is helpful, but the next challenge with both options is when I change the viewport from orthogonal to perspective. The perspective view always seems to be based on the center of the file and not the center of the viewport. I copied my building into another file and centered it and I was able to get the desired results. The building is not currently centered in my file because it is one of multiple buildings on a campus. Is there a way to modify the vanishing point with a horizontal section? This is so close to working! Building centered in design layer Building not centered in design layer
  4. Pat are you referring to the clip cube option? I would like to avoid using the clip cube for this. The horizontal section option does not let me use the flyover tool when editing the crop.
  5. The goal is to create a plan that is not orthogonal but a perspective view. This view must also be cut through the window and door openings so I am not just seeing the top of my walls. I was able to find a few very old forum posts on the topic, but none of them seem to be applicable anymore. Clip Cube and Camera - Image 1 My first approach was to set a camera up above the plan and then use the clip cube to get the model cut at the right height. It kind of works the way I want, but I have multiple buildings and multiple floors and the file only has one clip cube so this does not seem like a reasonable approach. The plans would have to me made, captured, and then placed as images or a PDF and not a live viewport. This will not work. Horizontal Section - image 2 My second approach was to make a horizontal section. This lets me set the cut height like I want, but I have not been able to figure out how to change the view so I can see the faces of my walls. This creates live viewports that will update as the layout changes which is important to my workflow on this (and every) project. Any help on how to achieve this would be appreciated! Image 1 Image 2
  6. Has anyone figured out a best practice for this? Modeling the curtain wall independently on each story allows it to show up correctly on plan, but in a 3d view and on exterior elevations the top/bottom frames are doubled up. My approach now would be to model it as a curtain wall that spans story layers then add a window that does not populate the schedule on the upper stories so the plan looks correct.
  7. Jim S.

    Arched Windows

    Yup just like that! There are both double and single windows as well.
  8. I am currently working on a project that is a series of old masonry buildings with arched masonry openings but square windows, a fairly common condition. In VW language the masonry opening is a "segment" top shape. The space between the square top of the window and the masonry "segment" lintel is filled by a panel. The window sash does not follow the curve of the masonry opening. My question is how can you model this? If I chose a segment top shape for the window the sash becomes arched as well as the opening. Do I really have to model the masonry opening as segmented, then the window in that opening with a square top shape, then an extrusion between the top sash and the curved lintel? I have about 300 windows with many, many different sizes with this condition. With the above approach I could make a series of symbols and groups but my head begins to spin thinking about how many I would need plus all the graphic overrides and more symbols to show the demo work on the Exterior Elevations. I am sure I am not the only one that has come across this condition with older buildings. What are some ways others have tackled this issue?
  9. So how does everyone approach interior elevation markers then? My understanding is: The interior elevation marker has to be places on the design layer (for example at 1/4"=1') to generate the elevations from the model. I want the interior elevation marker to only appear on an enlarged plan (for example at 1/2"=1') and now my interior elevation marker is double the size it should be. On the enlarged plan Advanced Viewport Properties I can scale the text to .5 but the interior elevation marker size does not change. Changing the marker scale and symbol scale does not change the interior elevation marker. Do I have to turn off the class my interior elevation markers are on for the enlarged plan viewport and add a "dumb" marker in annotations so it shows at the right scale? One tag to generate the elevations and another unlinked tag to show at the right scale? This can't be the answer...what am I missing?
  10. Working in a project sharing file with four other people in the office we have all experienced section, elevation, and plan viewports go completely missing. All of these viewports were generated from the model and placed on a sheet, then annotated with additional information. All of the annotation info is missing since the viewport itself is gone. This is a large amount of work that is now gone, a massive waste of time, and a huge expense to us to recreate this missing work. The viewports are not on a different sheet. The viewports are not moved off the sheet. Its become such a hinderance to the project with an impending deadline that we are abandoning a BIM approach to the drawings and doing it all in 2D, which is just disappointing.
  11. A project sharing file had all of the sheet layers disappear, yet in two existing working files the sheet layers were still there. When the project sharing file was opened by a different user to create a working file the sheet layers were missing. Has anyone come across this issue before? We were able to catch the issue early enough to create a new project file from one of the working files with minimal work needing to be redrawn.
  12. I came across this suggestion already and checked. The model is over the internal origin.
  13. I too have also been having this problem. Walls go missing from the file and with all classes and layers turned on they are nowhere to be found. This happens both in single user VW file and in Working Files. The only way we have been able to fix the file is to revert to an archive file. Currently using VW 2019.
  14. Wes, Thank you for your help!
  15. How do you modify the line thickness of window muntins? Pulling elevations from the model look good enough, but with a 7/8" wide muntin the two lines depicting it make it look to heavy.

 

7150 Riverwood Drive, Columbia, Maryland 21046, USA   |   Contact Us:   410-290-5114

 

© 2018 Vectorworks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Vectorworks, Inc. is part of the Nemetschek Group.

×
×
  • Create New...