Jump to content

jcogdell

Vectorworks, Inc Employee
  • Posts

    955
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jcogdell

  1. @Stefan B.
    The dev team are working to make this sort of cable part reporting possible through the equipment list feature but its not quite there yet.
    The only way I've found to do this currently is to use the 'used parts summed' criteria from the cable object properties in a worksheet and then export it to excel.
    I set up a excel book using power query that would automatically process any excel sheets dropped in a folder, spliting the columns by deliminator, collating the number of cables by type etc...
    It takes a bit to set up but it only needs to be done once and then all you need to do each time is update the workbook when a new worksheet is exported from Spotlight.

  2. If you have ConnectCAD check out the Cable sheet feature, it can produce this sort of cable plan.
    As @Scott C. Parker says it isn't really designed for architectral/domestic power wiring but it can be easily adapted to do so since cabling sheets and riser diagrams are intended to be used to communicate with onsite electrical contratcors which means it has to use their standards.

     

    • Like 2
  3. At the moment the manage loads tool is the official solution but the detach workflow needs to be improved and is on our internal enhancment priority list.

    @markdd's workflow is a good workaround, just make sure to turn off the autopositioning check boxes in the Spotlight preferences so the the load objects  do not automatically reconnect to the trusses until you want them to.


     

  4. Although the cable tools arn't really set up for this you can do it.
    First step is to create a custom connector to represent the combined cable

    Once you have the connector you can configure your lights to use it and create custom cable parts for your library.

    The cable tools learning path on the Vectorworks University covers all the steps in dedicated videos.
     

  5. What truss type are you using and what version of Spotlight?

    This error normally displays when the truss object definition has lost its length data.
    use the right click context menu command 'Customise Truss Symbol Data' to access the truss properties and check the Length field. Correct it as needed.

    A second option is to update the truss symbol defnintion in the file resources by importing the standard Spotlight library version of the truss into the file and choose 'replace symbol defnition in current document' whent he resource name conflict dialogue displays. this should reset the truss object.

  6. @AStein
    Change the consumer components in the distro for output components and add the consumers into the hoist symbol.
    What connector did you add to the cable connector xml?

    As I don't have it at my end it seems to have defaulted back to camlock connectors for all the components

  7. At the moment the only 2 options that I'm aware of are to

    • insert a point load (combined drop pipe and lamp weight) for calculation puposes
    • add the drop pipe to the light as a lighting device accessory. You'll need to set the drop pipe symbol up correctly as lighting device accessory andset it as a base acessory (same as a clamp)
  8. The easiest way is to set a class text style for the class that you insert the bridle object into. That way it will be drawn with the correct text style at creation.
    A second option is to use the text style dropdown in the bridle object properties after creation to change it (group select all the bridles together)

    • Like 1
  9. @RMDiekmann
    Thank you for bringing this to my attention I've tested it and you're correct only the single connection mode of the cable tool is correctly connecting the cables. All three other modes are drawing the cables but not connecting them correctly at the start or end.
    The other options for drawing cables are still working correctly (patch by command and using the dropdowns)
    I've opened a bug report

    • Like 1
  10. @AStein
    This is some really useful feedback, I'll make sure that it gets to the right people.
    We are actively looking into how to address many of the these workflow related issues.
    Some like the hanging position obscuring the trusses inside are much harder to address than others and will need time to carefully plan.
    But the more info and feedback you and others can povide identifying specific pain points and problems the easier for our developers to understand what needs to be addressed and what our priorities need to be.

     

    • Like 1
  11. did you apply the tag to the original light on the design layer or in the schematic view?

    Tags will maintain the original orientation based on the view they are first inserted in,

    so create the tag from the lighting device, then delete it in the design layer and reapply it using the data tag tool on the schematic light.

×
×
  • Create New...