Jump to content

_c_

Member
  • Posts

    2,434
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by _c_

  1. The geometry parsing itself would be very easy even for a novice, to fetch the proper sequence (which orthogonal line comes next) is not something that can be resolved simply. All in all if you have great many of such objects, you should indeed ask for someone to script it for you.

     

    I advise you against learning marionette or vectorscript it just for this task, because it is not a straight forward task that will bring you the joy of scripting, and that would be a pity. But if you want to get it going, ask in the Vectorscript forum.

     

  2. On 5/16/2020 at 11:21 AM, MullinRJ said:

    @Eric Mousse ,

       I bit the bullet and updated the Wall Openings plug-in object for VW 2020. This was not a trivial exercise which is probably why nobody has done it yet. The code is unlocked so you or anyone else can build on it. When you add it to your workspace, it will be in the "panta rhei" category*. All I ask is that you drop me a line in a week or two, after you've played with it a bit and let me know how it's working for you. If there are any glitches, especially if I've caused them, I'll help you iron them out.

     

    Wall Opening.vso.zip 7.71 kB · 4 downloads

     

    Have fun,

    Raymond

     

    * Hello, Petri.

     

     

    Raymond, I am always bewildered at your generosity, which, combined with your skills, makes it a true gift whatever you happen to do.

     

    • Like 1
  3. Yes.

     

    A few advises:

    • name your Design Layer Viewports well, so you can easily spot them and mass edit them in the visibility tab of the Organization Dialog (which, for some reason, most users never notice). Preferably add a suffix, such as vp- or dlvp
    • Set the Viewport Class Visibilities to Use Current Document Class Visibilities, so you don't need to go crazy setting them up at every change.
    • The needed elevation  (Z) for the design layer with the geometry must be 0. The DLVPs can then be treated like any other 3D object.
    • The Layer Wall Height (DZ) for the design layer with the geometry should match the standard height for your flats/floors. If you have multiple heights that cannot be resolved well.
    • The Walls can be set to layer wall height, or whatever, it depends on your specific planning needs.
    • Like 3
  4. Thank you Hippocode, I did know your tool since 2017. 

     

    I am interested in the process itself, I always prefer to develop my own tools, so that is easy to change whatever I want.

    I myself won't be able thus to enjoy your tool for this reason, but I think you did a great job there and will recommend it.

     

  5. 10 minutes ago, Helm said:

    I keep thinking about this bit about unit plans.  At present the only really efficient way is to develop symbols of the units.  They can be used in various projects and if updated every instance of the symbol changes.  Or one can also update a copy of a symbol and replace it in the overall floor plan easily.  

     

    No. Given that we don't know Unit Plan yet, presently the only really efficient way is using Design Layer Viewports.

    Both Symbols and Design Layer Viewports fail on variable wall height, obviously, but Symbols fail more, since their definition doesn't reside on design layer and walls are entities whose parent is required to be design layer.

     

    Edit: if you don't use walls, symbols are better.

  6. Glad to see finally components wrapping around windows, that was time.

    Materials as resources is good. I had my own command for managing this problem, glad to see this streamlined.

     

    I really hope that the architectural plug-ins get upgraded. I see no hint in this sense.

     

    • Like 1
  7. It is interesting the approach they take using three revisions 0, A and B.

     

    For those who don't speak German: 

    TGA = MEP engineer

    Tragwerksplanung = structural engineer

     

    745805126_ScreenShot2020-04-30at10_06_40.thumb.png.984233b027edc1683d01b577550b2fd7.png

     

     

    • Like 2
  8. Ciao Nigel,

     

    I hope to have some feedback from people planning and managing IFC voids, the 2D part is not relevant, it doesn't require any particular tool.

    On the other hand, the management of voids in a BIM environment is major trouble and pretty complex. It takes a number of tools and commands.

     

     

    Ah, BTW, I don't sell them nor share any of it.

    But since I am quite off my expertise (I represent very well the banal architect), I am eager to learn from others knowing more.

    • Like 1
  9. On 4/26/2020 at 5:46 PM, RexBradfield said:

    I have used this program since MiniCad Version 1.0.  Used it because it worked on Macintosh Computers.  I was sick of "/" and"*" commands.  I am a 74 year old Licensed Professional Engineer and Licensed Professional Land Surveyor.  Have used this program to design all kinds of engineering designs, including 100 lot subdivisions (by myself) and tens of thousands of Survey Plats. I bought Vectorworks 2008 and have used it since new.  But it requires OS X 10.7 or less.  So I have not updated my OS X operating systems just to keep using my Vectorworks because I could not afford the new program.  The 2008 has Renderworks, Landmark, Architect and Fundamentals. Now I have had to update my OS X to ElCapitan because my internet browsers will not be supported by OS X 10.7.5.  Does anyone have a different Vectorworks program that works with ElCapitan?  Otherwise, I am out of business. I just cannot afford the new programs.  I have stood by this product for nearly 37 years.  Please help.

     

    Rex, keep your old machine and buy an used iPad for the internet stuff!

     

    I know of an engineer here that still uses Windows 3 or 4! Happy ever since. Doesn't want to change his perfectly functioning engineering software (whatever that is).

    And my absolutely most beloved and respected structural engineer (80+) writes all by hand and uses paper snippets and glue to change his documents during the project.

    • Like 1
  10. In an IFC project there is a point where one must exchange "hole" objects between architect, structural and MEP engineers. So any wall or slab which is cut because of pipes or whatever, gets "Voids".

     

    This can be a complex process. The void objects must be evaluated, rejected and/or accepted in a collaboration software.

    For this reason a wall hole is not enough.

     

    The holes are usually represented in plan with a graphic like the one in the screenshot below, this for some reason doesn't seem to be needed in USA, since VW doesn't offer such a tool.

     

    1649819304_ScreenShot2020-04-29at12_50_42.thumb.png.20bd3e8ce349433584c8026ffba48c62.png

  11. Dear All,

     

    I am finalising a set of tools for Provision for Voids in Vectorworks. I would love to collect any kind of information about how you deal with these elements in your BIM projects. 

    Share your experience, tell me your problems, tell me your recommendations.

     

    Thank you for sharing!

  12. 44 minutes ago, Don Seidel said:

     Hearts out to Italy, which is harder hit for unknown reasons.

     

    Italy, then Spain, then France. Most hit right now.

    Warm folks with a habit of kissing and hugging. Bless our friendliness, it is killing us.

×
×
  • Create New...