lupin
-
Posts
74 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Marionette
Store
Posts posted by lupin
-
-
With a selected object, I find the right click activate class or layer option handy.
It would be even more useful if you could select multiple objects and turn on, off or grey classes and layers via right click.
A bit like autocad's express tools.
I think the programming would be pretty easy, and this would really speed up drawing.
Please consider!
-
Out of interest, do other BIM programs have elevation line weights sorted out?
Does anyone have a good method for VW?
I was thinking to try making all my line weights minimal except for the section class then adding heavy weight line work in annotations, but I'm not looking forward to the experiment! Especially as I suspect it won't work that well...
An efficient BIM documentation flow would be very useful. I'm sure it would generate lots of VW sales!
-
Perfect! Thank you!!!
-
+1 to moving underlying geometry
-
it would be useful if free modelling objects (extrudes etc.) could be viewed in top/plan as filled objects without going through the cumbersome auto-hybrid process.
... maybe this is logically impossible?
It would make free-modelling better fill the gap where the VW BIM tools are not adequate (sloping walls, gutters, or quirky stairs for example).
Ideally you could control line type, fill and opacity.
Auto-hybrid is a user unfriendly tool.
It requires too many clicks to do what you need to do, and editing is fraught.
For objects located at Z levels higher than the default 1000mm above 0 it's exceptionally tedious.
As I understand it, free-modelling is VW's answer for oddities and for when a (less mature?) BIM tool can't do the job.
VW needs to easily accommodate non-standard design to be really useful.
Please consider!
-
Can you edit the geometry of wall caps in plan so they're not perpendicular to the wall?
e.g. an internal wall meeting a parapet wall (joining them messes with the fit to roof objects, and it's not accurate anyway).
I feel as though there is probably aneasy way, but I can't find it!
-
-
Hi, have gutters progressed in VW since this thread?
Does anyone have advice on best BIM practice for making gutters?
I was thinking to draw gutter profile as a polygon, and extrude along path.
Convert to auto-hybrid to read in 2D.
Is there any reason I should use polygon, 3d polygon or nurbs for the profile or path?
Also an important part of any gutter tool would be:
profile & path obviously
z height (especially for drawing existing conditions - surveyors often provide top or bottom of gutter heights)
downpipe profiles & locations
degrees fall
It would be cool to be able to do rainwater calculations with a comprehensive gutter tool!
Thanks!
-
useful dumb question! Thanks for this.
-
Your hangs sounded a lot like mine.
My hangs have cleared up, Kaspersky back on, wireless back on, maximum undos set to 20. I was working with auto-hybrids too.
I'll be interested to know what the problem was.
-
Seemed to be an issue with Kaspersky security software.
-
Thanks bcd for that tip. This model is pretty simple so far, I don't think there's stray geometry in my roof layer, but that method would be a good way to go for complex models.
-
thanks for asking Jim, and sorry for the repeat post.
yes my roof is in separate layer.
My site model is also in a separate layer.
It seems to matter which order I do "fit walls to objects".
If I do the top of the wall first, and then the bottom separately, it's more reliable.
Also, strangely, it seems to work better if I make a more complex extrude (for a fancy parapet wall) than a simple one. I can then edit the extrude to simplify it and redo the "fit walls to objects" to get the correct parapet wall shape.
I'm wondering if VW doesn't like that my site model layer is set to z=0, whereas my building model layers are more like z=37000 and z=40000.
(I'm working in mm).
Finding these work arounds is time consuming - I can't work out the logic of them.
-
actually they're fitting to points near z=0 (e.g. z=-278.576mm) But I'm still not sure why. There's nothing there to fit to.
-
Using fit walls to objects, some (but not all) of my walls are fitting down to the ground plane (z=0) instead of up to my roof layer objects.
I'm drawing up existing conditions from a land survey, so my model is around 35m above the ground plane.
There are no objects (loci etc) on the roof layer that I can find at z = 0.
Sorry not to post a screenshot, but I'm not sure how to upload one to the techboard.
Any help much appreciated!
-
Thank you!
-
... and the stake objects change to non-scientific notation if I change their class...
-
I think it depends on my document setting > units > decimal precision being set high.
Reducing the decimal precision doesn't seem to update my existing stake objects' notation style, but new stake objects are made without scientific notation.
-
Does anyone know how to disable scientific notation?
When I specify a dimension greater than 9999, VW defaults to scientific notation, i.e.: 10,000 is displayed as 1e04. It makes it hard to read.
I can't seem to find a fix.
Any help appreciated!
-
I'm getting long hangs too.
It seems to come and go, as if a file or group of files get corrupted somehow (e.g: same model, different class and texture colours).
Panning, zooming, exiting out of editing windows (exit group, exit symbol, ok to texture edits, ok to new classes etc.)
My file isn't huge - 40MB.
When I started a simple new file from scratch(with only imported textures), it seemed OK so far.
I'm on a new secondhand iMac, so I'm not sure if it's the machine or VW or me (I've used VW for 2d a lot but I'm new to trying to do it BIM-like).
-
Yes please to dashed option for grey layer!
Perhaps the user could choose their "grey layer" line weight, colour and line type in preferences?
Ideally with separate sheet layer and design layer options, so it worked as usual in design layers, but printed as desired in sheet layers.
It wouldn't cause chaos, just give control over the shade of grey?
-
I'm new to trying to use VW in a BIM-like way, and therefore to auto-hybrids, so please correct me if I'm wrong!
Here's an auto-hybrid wishlist:
It would be great if they were easier to edit - more like a symbol edit.
The other geometry should appear greyed when you edit 2D or 3D so you can ensure they are lined up in top/plan.
I'd like the dialogue box to pop-up automatically so with not much clicking I can set layer, class and cut plane height (say if I'm making an auto hybrid out of a roof too tricky to model with the roof tools - a bullnose verandah roof for example).
I wish at least auto-hybrids would not automatically revert to the current class. As they are awkward to edit, I like to make them towards the end of making a model, and there may be a whole lot of them with different classes - non-standard roofs, gutters, parapet wall caps, bits of joinery, odd stairs etc.
I'd also like to be able to do a batch auto-hybrid, and be able to choose whether they are made as one or individual objects.
I suppose they'll be outmoded when top/plan type drawings are no longer used?
I wonder can this work properly yet with clip-cube?
Does anyone no longer use top/plan in architectural drawings?
Just trying to get my head around BIM workflow.
-
so useful, thanks!
better looking sections - advanced section properties control
in Wishlist - Feature and Content Requests
Posted · Edited by lupin
I'm yet to try 2017, so my wish might already be true?
I'd like to generate good looking 2D architectural drawings from BIM without too much messing around.
It would be useful to generate sections that have a heavy line for the objects in section, but retain the object's own fill.
As it stands I have to:
a)
3 overlapping section viewports - one for the object's own fill, one for a heavy section line using a section style with no fill, one for the site model only with a section style with fill.
OR
b)
manually draw over a viewport in annotations - not great for changing the model, and is an annoying hybrid of BIM and 2D drawing
You could generate pretty good sections straight from the model with:
a)
"advanced section properties - attributes - separate cross sections" if you could control line and fill options individually. PLUS
b) a site model fill option somehow OR
c) another way to deal with it might be if section viewports used the same attribute settings as Top/Plan...