Jump to content

sbarrett

Vectorworks, Inc Employee
  • Content Count

    211
  • Joined

  • Last visited

File Comments posted by sbarrett


  1. This should work anywhere in the world. To look up a location outside the US, you can write "[City], [Country]" or even a more specific address in the Location field in the OIP. What that field does is it takes a location and converts it to latitude and longitude. It then searches the Iowa State University's database of weather stations (https://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/request/download.phtml?network=AWOS) and downloads data from the three closest stations to that latitude and longitude. You can change the number of weather stations that it queries if you want. The most accurate data is usually found at airport weather stations, so if you want to type in the location of the nearest airport, change the Num of Stns to 1 and you will get only that weather data.

    • Like 1
  2. Wind Rose

       92    6

    @jeff prince are you using the latest wind rose file posted here? Also, are you using the latest build of 2019? There were problems with geopy not being installed in 2018 I believe, but it should work in the current version of the software.


  3. Hello @amcdonell-

     

    This is a bug that will be fixed for 2019 in a future service pack. The problem is that with the Mac OS, Apple changed the way that they write file paths, so the command to locate an external library (in this case the geopy library) is broken. This is only a bug for those running Vectorworks on a Mac that is running 10.13 or higher. I also run this OS so I am currently experiencing this bug as well. Unfortunately I don't have any fixes. The script should still work on a PC and on an older Mac OS. This is true for all of my weather analysis graphs.

  4. Barn Door

       193    6

    I did give it a record but I did not attach the actual door record. If you click on the data tab of the object, you can see the fields I gave the record - if you have any other suggestions I would be happy to put them in. 


  5. On 3/6/2018 at 2:46 PM, Kevin McAllister said:

     

     

    I bet it would be possible to build a Marionette toolkit of joint/relationship nodes or wrapped networks that could simplify the process of articulating things. I think these show incredible potential. I would love to see an introductory webinar on how to approach articulation that included building some simple examples. There's clearly a proper way to break down the movement and decide how to structure the network.

     

    Kevin

     

     

    @Kevin McAllisterI have created a much simpler Marionette object that is built with articulating symbols that you can check out. It is built using the same principle as the Condor - each symbol is placed and rotated relative to the location of the other parts and the values in the OIP. It is located here:

     


  6. You can reference it just like any other symbol, just know that all of the parts will come with it, including the part symbols, the textures, and the Marionette gradients, but they will no longer be in folders, so it might be a little messy. The only thing you would need to do is to move the Condor60 PIO red symbol outside of its folder (that is the Marionette object). Then you can reference it.

     

    RMafterReference.thumb.png.9dc6dd8875d2fc65cf31a945361afce2.png


  7. Hello@digitalcarbon,

     

    A Marionette object functions just like any other parametric object - you can convert it to a symbol but you would lose the ability to edit it in the OIP. Just like a plug-in object though, it still has an insertion point. If you want to add geometry to make that visible you can by editing the Condor_base symbol (just don't delete anything from it or change its insertion point or the insertion point of any of the other part symbols).


  8. Hello @ericjhbergI thought I responded to your comments earlier but I can't seem to find what I posted.

    1. Is there any way to make the horizontal curvature more regular? I know this is using nurbs, so the answer may very well be no, but we often are trying to design ramps on a radius which is difficult to do accurately with nurbs or bezier curves.

     

    - In order to make this path based (allow it to have control geometry that was editable with the reshape tool), I found the easiest way to accomplish it was using a Bezier curve. To write it using a poly with arc vertices would be a very different script. How would you draw the 2D profile of a ramp?

     

    2. The cross slope profile created by the loft surface can create some pretty extreme cross slopes. Is there a way to better control this?

     

    - I built the ramp by dividing each edge length equally and stepping it that way, I didn't know how to best calculate slopes for ramps. for stairs it is a matter of finding a tangent to the curve but with a ramp I imagine you want you slope to be shallower going around curves and steeper on straightaways. Any pointers on how you would model this would be greatly appreciated. Maybe even starting with how NOT to do it is helpful. ;)

    • Like 1

  9. I'm sorry but this file uses capabilities that are not available in Vectorworks 2016, namely importing a Python library. This Marionette object and the other Weather Analysis MOs use an external Python library that gives you latitude and longitude based on an address/location.

 

7150 Riverwood Drive, Columbia, Maryland 21046, USA   |   Contact Us:   410-290-5114

 

© 2018 Vectorworks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Vectorworks, Inc. is part of the Nemetschek Group.

×